PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDYYX vs. AFNIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDYYX vs. AFNIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund (SDYYX) and AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SDYYX

1D
0.11%
1M
5.64%
YTD
10.45%
6M
10.01%
1Y
27.23%
3Y*
21.94%
5Y*
13.68%
10Y*
14.88%

AFNIX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDYYX vs. AFNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDYYX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund
10.45%18.85%24.65%21.47%-16.51%31.05%20.21%27.13%-8.08%19.29%
AFNIX
AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I
1.74%11.36%16.23%6.59%-8.77%25.23%6.60%25.71%-1.98%19.51%

Correlation

The correlation between SDYYX and AFNIX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between SDYYX and AFNIX has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDYYX vs. AFNIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDYYX
SDYYX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SDYYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDYYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDYYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SDYYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDYYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

AFNIX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDYYX vs. AFNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund (SDYYX) and AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDYYXAFNIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.91

SDYYX vs. AFNIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDYYXAFNIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

Drawdowns

SDYYX vs. AFNIX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDYYXAFNIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

Volatility

SDYYX vs. AFNIX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDYYXAFNIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.55%

SDYYX vs. AFNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDYYX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AFNIX's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDYYX vs. AFNIX - Dividend Comparison

SDYYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.67%, less than AFNIX's 31.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFNIX
AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I
31.18%14.13%6.88%3.43%4.61%1.78%1.75%2.13%2.04%1.72%1.79%2.66%
SDYYX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund
18.67%20.62%11.70%9.69%14.47%11.12%7.62%1.87%2.33%1.78%1.14%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDYYX and AFNIX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDYYX and AFNIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer