PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDY vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SDY vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SDY vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SDY
SPDR S&P Dividend ETF
5.44%8.18%8.45%2.61%-0.54%25.32%1.71%23.29%-2.14%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
10.46%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.10%1.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDY achieves a 5.44% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 10.46% return.


SDY

1D
-0.07%
1M
-5.88%
YTD
5.44%
6M
5.59%
1Y
10.47%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
6.99%
10Y*
9.36%

GLDM

1D
1.74%
1M
-10.65%
YTD
10.46%
6M
23.17%
1Y
52.61%
3Y*
34.09%
5Y*
22.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SDY vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SDY vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDY
SDY Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDY Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDY Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDY vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDYGLDMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.76

1.92

-1.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.17

2.35

-1.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.35

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

2.74

-1.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.80

10.04

-6.24

SDY vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDY Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDY and GLDM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDYGLDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

1.92

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

1.27

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

1.11

-0.64

Correlation

The correlation between SDY and GLDM is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SDY vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

SDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SDY
SPDR S&P Dividend ETF
2.53%2.61%2.56%2.64%2.55%2.63%2.85%2.45%2.73%4.69%3.30%6.20%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SDY vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDY drawdown since its inception was -54.75%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDY and GLDM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SDYGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.75%

-21.63%

-33.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

-19.14%

+8.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.21%

-20.92%

+5.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.90%

-11.68%

+5.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-6.05%

-0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

5.22%

-2.49%

Volatility

SDY vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) is 3.11%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that SDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SDYGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

10.44%

-7.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.33%

24.12%

-16.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.87%

27.58%

-13.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.06%

17.65%

-3.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.07%

16.78%

+0.29%