SDY vs. GLDM
SDY (SPDR S&P Dividend ETF) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - SDY is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SDY returned 5.97%/yr vs 18.49%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SDY charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.
Performance
SDY vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDY achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 3.00% return.
SDY
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 7.45%
- 1Y
- 12.80%
- 3Y*
- 9.83%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- 9.29%
GLDM
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- 32.42%
- 3Y*
- 31.49%
- 5Y*
- 18.49%
- 10Y*
- —
SDY vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDY SPDR S&P Dividend ETF | 7.49% | 8.18% | 8.45% | 2.61% | -0.54% | 25.32% | 1.71% | 23.29% | -2.14% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 3.00% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDY and GLDM is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018 | 0.07 |
The correlation between SDY and GLDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SDY vs. GLDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDY
GLDM
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
SDY
GLDM
-
Consumer Defensive
SDY
GLDM
-
Utilities
SDY
GLDM
-
Financial Services
SDY
GLDM
-
Technology
SDY
GLDM
-
Basic Materials
SDY
GLDM
Healthcare
SDY
GLDM
-
Consumer Cyclical
SDY
GLDM
-
Real Estate
SDY
GLDM
-
Energy
SDY
GLDM
-
Communication Services
SDY
GLDM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDY vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
SDY
GLDM
SDY vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDY | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.25 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 1.70 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.60 | 4.23 | +0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDY | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 1.24 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 1.04 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 1.02 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
SDY vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDY drawdown since its inception was -54.75%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDY and GLDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDY | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.75% | -21.63% | -33.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.67% | -19.14% | +11.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.39% | -19.14% | +4.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.21% | -20.92% | +5.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.07% | -17.65% | +13.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | -6.22% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 7.69% | -4.90% |
Volatility
SDY vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) is 2.47%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that SDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDY | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.47% | 5.47% | -3.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.43% | 22.99% | -15.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.33% | 26.39% | -16.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.03% | 17.91% | -3.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.08% | 16.85% | +0.23% |
SDY vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDY vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
SDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDY SPDR S&P Dividend ETF | 2.48% | 2.61% | 2.56% | 2.64% | 2.55% | 2.63% | 2.85% | 2.45% | 2.73% | 4.69% | 3.30% | 6.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDY and GLDM have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLDM has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to SDY (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDY dropped -54.75% vs GLDM's -21.63%.
On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 18.49% vs 5.97% for SDY. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SDY has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 18.49% return vs 5.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SDY.
SDY has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.
SDY is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while GLDM is Gold. SDY tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SDY and 0.10% for GLDM.
SDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDY and GLDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer