PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDVD vs. DHSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDVD vs. DHSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (SDVD) and Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF (DHSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDVD achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly higher than DHSB's 4.21% return.


SDVD

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
7.75%
6M
8.14%
1Y
19.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DHSB

1D
-0.01%
1M
1.26%
YTD
4.21%
6M
5.04%
1Y
9.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDVD vs. DHSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SDVD and DHSB is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2025

0.61

The correlation between SDVD and DHSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDVD vs. DHSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDVD
SDVD Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SDVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDVD Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SDVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDVD Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

DHSB
DHSB Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DHSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHSB Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DHSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHSB Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDVD vs. DHSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (SDVD) and Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF (DHSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDVDDHSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.41

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.98

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.65

15.55

-7.90

SDVD vs. DHSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDVD Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the DHSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDVD and DHSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDVDDHSBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.74

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.82

-0.05

Drawdowns

SDVD vs. DHSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDVD drawdown since its inception was -24.17%, which is greater than DHSB's maximum drawdown of -7.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDVD and DHSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDVDDHSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.17%

-7.65%

-16.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.76%

-3.32%

-5.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

-0.37%

-2.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.86%

-0.88%

-3.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

0.63%

+1.94%

Volatility

SDVD vs. DHSB - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (SDVD) and Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF (DHSB) have volatilities of 3.78% and 3.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDVDDHSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

3.65%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.33%

5.20%

+5.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.31%

5.70%

+8.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

8.63%

+9.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

8.63%

+9.56%

SDVD vs. DHSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDVD has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DHSB's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDVD vs. DHSB - Dividend Comparison

SDVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.95%, more than DHSB's 1.20% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DHSB
Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF
1.20%1.25%0.00%0.00%
SDVD
FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
8.95%8.36%9.26%3.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDVD and DHSB have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDVD has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to DHSB (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDVD dropped -24.17% vs DHSB's -7.65%.

On 1-year performance, SDVD leads with 19.64% vs 9.84% for DHSB. On fees, DHSB is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, DHSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SDVD has performed better with a 19.64% return vs 9.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DHSB is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SDVD.

SDVD has the higher dividend yield at 8.95%, compared with 1.20% for DHSB.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Day Hagan. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for SDVD and 0.68% for DHSB.

DHSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDVD and DHSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer