PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SDUS.L vs. MXUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SDUS.L vs. MXUS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SDUS.L (iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and MXUS.L (Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from iShares and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SDUS.L returned 14.04%/yr vs 13.58%/yr for MXUS.L. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SDUS.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MXUS.L.

Performance

SDUS.L vs. MXUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SDUS.L) and Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SDUS.L having a 10.25% return and MXUS.L slightly higher at 10.31%.

SDUS.L

1D
0.08%
1M
5.05%
YTD
10.25%
6M
10.89%
1Y
28.55%
3Y*
23.31%
5Y*
14.04%
10Y*
—

MXUS.L

1D
0.02%
1M
4.59%
YTD
10.31%
6M
10.99%
1Y
27.75%
3Y*
22.47%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
15.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDUS.L vs. MXUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SDUS.L
iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		10.25%17.72%26.89%30.69%-21.32%28.28%22.03%30.98%-7.54%
MXUS.L
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF		10.31%17.34%25.57%27.84%-20.03%27.90%20.98%31.00%-7.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SDUS.L and MXUS.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018

0.99

The correlation between SDUS.L and MXUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

SDUS.L vs. MXUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SDUS.L
MXUS.L

Technology

38.0%
35.4%

Financial Services

12.4%
11.6%

Communication Services

12.1%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
10.1%

Healthcare

9.2%
8.6%

Industrials

7.7%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
4.8%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.9%

Energy

1.9%
3.6%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Utilities

1.3%
2.3%

Technology

SDUS.L
38.0%
MXUS.L
35.4%

Financial Services

SDUS.L
12.4%
MXUS.L
11.6%

Communication Services

SDUS.L
12.1%
MXUS.L
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SDUS.L
10.8%
MXUS.L
10.1%

Healthcare

SDUS.L
9.2%
MXUS.L
8.6%

Industrials

SDUS.L
7.7%
MXUS.L
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

SDUS.L
2.7%
MXUS.L
4.8%

Real Estate

SDUS.L
2.0%
MXUS.L
1.9%

Energy

SDUS.L
1.9%
MXUS.L
3.6%

Basic Materials

SDUS.L
1.8%
MXUS.L
1.8%

Utilities

SDUS.L
1.3%
MXUS.L
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF

Often compared with SDUS.L:
SDUS.L vs. GPSA.LSDUS.L vs. VWRA.LSDUS.L vs. IUSA.LSDUS.L vs. ISDU.LSDUS.L vs. MVEA.LSDUS.L vs. XZMD.LSDUS.L vs. BBUS.L
Often compared with MXUS.L:
MXUS.L vs. USSC.LMXUS.L vs. BIRDXMXUS.L vs. INAA.LMXUS.L vs. UC96.LMXUS.L vs. QUALMXUS.L vs. VOOMXUS.L vs. ACWI

Return for Risk

SDUS.L vs. MXUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SDUS.L
SDUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SDUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SDUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
MXUS.L
MXUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
MXUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
MXUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDUS.L vs. MXUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SDUS.L) and Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SDUS.LMXUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.28
2.37

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.33
3.44

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.43

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

3.31

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.48

14.01

-1.52

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SDUS.L vs. MXUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the MXUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDUS.L and MXUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SDUS.LMXUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.37

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.84

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.93

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.94

-0.04

Drawdowns

SDUS.L vs. MXUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDUS.L drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, roughly equal to the maximum MXUS.L drawdown of -34.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDUS.L and MXUS.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SDUS.LMXUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.90%

-34.38%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.48%

-8.35%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.29%

-18.78%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.23%

-25.25%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-34.38%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.45%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-3.83%

-1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

1.98%

+0.30%

Volatility

SDUS.L vs. MXUS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SDUS.L) has a higher volatility of 3.55% compared to Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) at 3.20%. This indicates that SDUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SDUS.LMXUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

3.20%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.26%

8.55%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.46%

11.64%

+0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.80%

16.19%

+0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.23%

16.42%

+1.81%

SDUS.L vs. MXUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDUS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than MXUS.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SDUS.L vs. MXUS.L - Dividend Comparison

SDUS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while MXUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MXUS.L
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SDUS.L
iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		0.73%0.80%0.90%1.06%1.32%0.95%1.18%1.40%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.99, SDUS.L and MXUS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, MXUS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MXUS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for SDUS.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SDUS.L and 0.05% for MXUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDUS.L and MXUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer