PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDSI vs. FTGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDSI vs. FTGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF (SDSI) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDSI achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly lower than FTGC's 20.51% return.


SDSI

1D
0.15%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.33%
6M
1.40%
1Y
4.94%
3Y*
5.85%
5Y*
10Y*

FTGC

1D
-0.33%
1M
-6.35%
YTD
20.51%
6M
22.09%
1Y
27.15%
3Y*
13.64%
5Y*
12.88%
10Y*
7.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDSI vs. FTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SDSI
American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF
1.33%6.54%5.63%5.88%1.99%
FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
20.51%14.61%9.96%-5.36%2.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SDSI and FTGC is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2022

-0.01

The correlation between SDSI and FTGC shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDSI vs. FTGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDSI
SDSI Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SDSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDSI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SDSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDSI Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FTGC
FTGC Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDSI vs. FTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF (SDSI) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDSIFTGCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.31

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.42

2.80

+1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.82

9.24

+11.58

SDSI vs. FTGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDSI Sharpe Ratio is 3.20, which is higher than the FTGC Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDSI and FTGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDSI vs. FTGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDSI drawdown since its inception was -1.29%, smaller than the maximum FTGC drawdown of -59.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDSI and FTGC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDSIFTGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.29%

-59.47%

+58.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.17%

-9.63%

+8.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.29%

-10.39%

+9.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-9.63%

+9.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.24%

-27.35%

+27.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

2.95%

-2.70%

Volatility

SDSI vs. FTGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF (SDSI) is 0.50%, while First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) has a volatility of 3.15%. This indicates that SDSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDSIFTGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.50%

3.15%

-2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.19%

13.19%

-12.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62%

15.66%

-14.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.28%

15.85%

-13.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.28%

14.71%

-12.43%

SDSI vs. FTGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDSI has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than FTGC's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDSI vs. FTGC - Dividend Comparison

SDSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, less than FTGC's 15.91% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
15.91%17.74%3.05%3.34%10.35%7.21%0.00%0.81%0.80%1.21%
SDSI
American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF
4.79%4.91%5.49%5.37%0.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDSI and FTGC have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTGC has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to SDSI (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDSI dropped -1.29% vs FTGC's -59.47%.

On 3-year performance, FTGC leads with 13.64% vs 5.85% for SDSI. On fees, SDSI is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, SDSI has been the lower-risk option at 0.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FTGC has performed better with a 13.64% return vs 5.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SDSI is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FTGC.

FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 15.91%, compared with 4.79% for SDSI.

SDSI is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while FTGC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: American Century and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for SDSI and 0.95% for FTGC.

SDSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDSI and FTGC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer