SDOW vs. NEMG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SDOW (ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30) and NEMG (Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SDOW is passively managed, while NEMG is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.46, they often move in opposite directions. SDOW charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NEMG.

Performance

SDOW vs. NEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) and Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SDOW having a -20.41% return and NEMG slightly lower at -20.44%.

SDOW

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -6.58%
• YTD: -20.41%
• 6M: -18.40%
• 1Y: -43.24%
• 3Y*: -33.77%
• 5Y*: -25.99%
• 10Y*: -38.66%

NEMG

• 1D: -7.98%
• 1M: -20.02%
• YTD: -20.44%
• 6M: -28.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDOW vs. NEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SDOW ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30	-20.41%	-5.40%
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF	-20.44%	22.87%

Correlation

The correlation between SDOW and NEMG is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	-0.46

Return for Risk

SDOW vs. NEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDOW

SDOW Risk / Return Rank: 1
SDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
SDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
SDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 1
SDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
SDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 0

NEMG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDOW vs. NEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) and Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SDOW	NEMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.17	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.77	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.01	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.70	—	—

Drawdowns

SDOW vs. NEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDOW drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than NEMG's maximum drawdown of -57.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOW and NEMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SDOW	NEMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.96%	-57.56%	-42.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-75.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-83.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.96%	-53.44%	-46.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-89.59%	-23.21%	-66.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.36%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SDOW	NEMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.39%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.43%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.16%	102.63%	-65.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.43%	102.63%	-58.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.13%	102.63%	-50.50%

SDOW vs. NEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDOW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NEMG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SDOW vs. NEMG - Dividend Comparison

SDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, while NEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SDOW ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30	5.85%	5.80%	8.30%	5.38%	0.36%	0.00%	0.52%	2.17%	1.23%	0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SDOW and NEMG in my portfolio?

SDOW and NEMG have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SDOW or NEMG?

On fees, NEMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SDOW or NEMG?

NEMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SDOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SDOW or NEMG?

SDOW has the higher dividend yield at 5.85%, compared with 0.00% for NEMG.

What is the main difference between SDOW and NEMG?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SDOW and 0.75% for NEMG.