PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDOW vs. ILCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDOW vs. ILCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDOW achieves a -15.72% return, which is significantly lower than ILCV's 7.75% return. Over the past 10 years, SDOW has underperformed ILCV with an annualized return of -37.95%, while ILCV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.68% annualized return.


SDOW

1D
3.40%
1M
-10.23%
YTD
-15.72%
6M
-16.21%
1Y
-39.90%
3Y*
-32.27%
5Y*
-24.52%
10Y*
-37.95%

ILCV

1D
-0.44%
1M
2.76%
YTD
7.75%
6M
7.41%
1Y
26.58%
3Y*
18.61%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
11.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDOW vs. ILCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDOW
ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30
-15.72%-33.94%-25.95%-28.78%4.00%-49.00%-66.48%-49.54%-0.30%-52.26%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
7.75%18.79%17.03%14.43%-7.02%26.71%-0.84%25.19%-6.24%15.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SDOW and ILCV is -0.89, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

-0.91

The correlation between SDOW and ILCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.93 to -0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

SDOW vs. ILCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDOW
ILCV

Financial Services

74.6%
16.5%

Basic Materials

-

2.4%

Communication Services

-

8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.6%

Energy

-

6.0%

Healthcare

-

11.5%

Industrials

-

8.8%

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Technology

-

23.8%

Utilities

-

3.5%

Financial Services

SDOW
74.6%
ILCV
16.5%

Basic Materials

SDOW

-

ILCV
2.4%

Communication Services

SDOW

-

ILCV
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SDOW

-

ILCV
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

SDOW

-

ILCV
7.6%

Energy

SDOW

-

ILCV
6.0%

Healthcare

SDOW

-

ILCV
11.5%

Industrials

SDOW

-

ILCV
8.8%

Real Estate

SDOW

-

ILCV
2.0%

Technology

SDOW

-

ILCV
23.8%

Utilities

SDOW

-

ILCV
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDOW vs. ILCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDOW
SDOW Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCV
ILCV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ILCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDOW vs. ILCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDOWILCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.50

-0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

4.08

-5.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.45

16.87

-18.32

SDOW vs. ILCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDOW Sharpe Ratio is -1.11, which is lower than the ILCV Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDOW and ILCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDOWILCVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.11

2.72

-3.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.56

0.81

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.73

0.70

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.78

0.46

-1.24

Drawdowns

SDOW vs. ILCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDOW drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than ILCV's maximum drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOW and ILCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDOWILCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.96%

-58.63%

-41.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.45%

-6.55%

-36.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.39%

-14.95%

-59.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.35%

-18.58%

-63.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.26%

-35.53%

-63.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.96%

-0.60%

-99.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.43%

-9.32%

-80.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.47%

1.58%

+25.89%

Volatility

SDOW vs. ILCV - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) has a higher volatility of 8.86% compared to iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) at 2.01%. This indicates that SDOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDOWILCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.86%

2.01%

+6.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.01%

6.97%

+21.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.20%

9.82%

+26.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.29%

14.21%

+30.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.13%

16.66%

+35.47%

SDOW vs. ILCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDOW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDOW vs. ILCV - Dividend Comparison

SDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, more than ILCV's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
1.63%1.77%1.99%2.27%2.32%2.01%2.96%2.70%2.93%2.32%2.76%3.01%
SDOW
ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30
5.52%5.80%8.30%5.38%0.36%0.00%0.52%2.17%1.23%0.09%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDOW and ILCV have a correlation of -0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDOW has higher volatility (8.86%) compared to ILCV (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDOW dropped -99.96% vs ILCV's -58.63%.

On 10-year performance, ILCV leads with 11.68% vs -37.95% for SDOW. On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ILCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ILCV has performed better with a 11.68% return vs -37.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SDOW.

SDOW has the higher dividend yield at 5.52%, compared with 1.63% for ILCV.

SDOW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ILCV is Large Cap Value Equities. SDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average (-300%), while ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SDOW and 0.04% for ILCV.

ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDOW and ILCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer