SDOW vs. DDM
SDOW (ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30) and DDM (ProShares Ultra Dow30) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - SDOW tracks the Dow Jones Industrial Average (-300%) while DDM tracks the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SDOW returned -38.25%/yr vs 19.86%/yr for DDM. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SDOW vs. DDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDOW achieves a -20.04% return, which is significantly lower than DDM's 12.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SDOW has underperformed DDM with an annualized return of -38.25%, while DDM has yielded a comparatively higher 19.86% annualized return.
SDOW
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -7.71%
- YTD
- -20.04%
- 6M
- -19.51%
- 1Y
- -44.52%
- 3Y*
- -32.45%
- 5Y*
- -27.17%
- 10Y*
- -38.25%
DDM
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 4.94%
- YTD
- 12.72%
- 6M
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 43.19%
- 3Y*
- 24.91%
- 5Y*
- 14.57%
- 10Y*
- 19.86%
SDOW vs. DDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDOW ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 | -20.04% | -33.94% | -25.95% | -28.78% | 4.00% | -49.00% | -66.48% | -49.54% | -0.30% | -52.26% |
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30 | 12.72% | 20.59% | 21.60% | 24.34% | -19.48% | 41.97% | 2.14% | 47.98% | -13.46% | 59.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDOW and DDM is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | -1.00 |
The correlation between SDOW and DDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
SDOW vs. DDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDOW
DDM
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SDOW
DDM
Basic Materials
SDOW
-
DDM
Communication Services
SDOW
-
DDM
Consumer Cyclical
SDOW
-
DDM
Consumer Defensive
SDOW
-
DDM
Energy
SDOW
-
DDM
Healthcare
SDOW
-
DDM
Industrials
SDOW
-
DDM
Real Estate
SDOW
-
DDM
-
Technology
SDOW
-
DDM
Utilities
SDOW
-
DDM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDOW vs. DDM — Risk / Return Rank
SDOW
DDM
SDOW vs. DDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) and ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDOW | DDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.29 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 2.25 | -3.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | 8.25 | -9.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDOW vs. DDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDOW drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than DDM's maximum drawdown of -81.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOW and DDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDOW | DDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -81.70% | -18.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.01% | -19.31% | -26.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.55% | -31.62% | -43.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.15% | -40.18% | -42.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.29% | -63.13% | -36.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -1.83% | -98.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.58% | -17.29% | -72.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.91% | 5.26% | +23.65% |
Volatility
SDOW vs. DDM - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) has a higher volatility of 12.87% compared to ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) at 8.69%. This indicates that SDOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDOW | DDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.87% | 8.69% | +4.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.47% | 19.62% | +9.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.15% | 24.90% | +12.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.48% | 29.66% | +14.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.22% | 34.82% | +17.40% |
SDOW vs. DDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SDOW and DDM have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SDOW vs. DDM - Dividend Comparison
SDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than DDM's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30 | 0.89% | 0.94% | 1.00% | 0.27% | 0.83% | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.62% | 0.89% | 0.68% | 1.08% | 1.23% |
SDOW ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 | 5.82% | 5.80% | 8.30% | 5.38% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.17% | 1.23% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDOW and DDM have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDOW has higher volatility (12.87%) compared to DDM (8.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDOW dropped -99.96% vs DDM's -81.70%.
On 10-year performance, DDM leads with 19.86% vs -38.25% for SDOW. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, DDM has been the lower-risk option at 8.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DDM has performed better with a 19.86% return vs -38.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SDOW and DDM have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SDOW has the higher dividend yield at 5.82%, compared with 0.89% for DDM.
SDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average (-300%), while DDM tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (200%).
DDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDOW and DDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer