PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDIU.L vs. SILG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDIU.L vs. SILG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Cap (SDIU.L) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SDIU.L is traded in USD, while SILG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SILG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDIU.L achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly higher than SILG.L's -9.39% return.


SDIU.L

1D
0.49%
1M
0.42%
6M
4.40%
YTD
7.75%
1Y
16.48%
3Y*
13.23%
5Y*
10Y*

SILG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-13.36%
6M
-20.80%
YTD
-9.39%
1Y
58.71%
3Y*
41.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDIU.L vs. SILG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SDIU.L
Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Cap
7.75%28.35%0.34%5.69%-14.25%
SILG.L
Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
-9.39%173.15%11.64%-1.40%-9.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SDIU.L and SILG.L is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2022

0.45

The correlation between SDIU.L and SILG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDIU.L vs. SILG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDIU.L
SDIU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SDIU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDIU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDIU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SDIU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDIU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

SILG.L
SILG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SILG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SILG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SILG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SILG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SILG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDIU.L vs. SILG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Cap (SDIU.L) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDIU.LSILG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.20

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

1.52

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.43

3.40

+3.02

SDIU.L vs. SILG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDIU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the SILG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDIU.L and SILG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDIU.L vs. SILG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDIU.L drawdown since its inception was -35.60%, smaller than the maximum SILG.L drawdown of -38.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDIU.L and SILG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDIU.LSILG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.60%

-38.86%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.36%

-38.86%

+32.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.80%

-38.86%

+20.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.43%

-35.74%

+32.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.95%

-13.72%

-5.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

17.30%

-14.66%

Volatility

SDIU.L vs. SILG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Cap (SDIU.L) is 3.28%, while Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) has a volatility of 15.78%. This indicates that SDIU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDIU.LSILG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

15.78%

-12.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.01%

44.46%

-36.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.20%

55.10%

-43.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

43.42%

-26.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

43.42%

-26.39%

SDIU.L vs. SILG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDIU.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SILG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDIU.L vs. SILG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SDIU.L nor SILG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SDIU.L and SILG.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SDIU.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SDIU.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SILG.L.

SDIU.L is categorized as Dividend, while SILG.L is Silver. SDIU.L tracks Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Cap, while SILG.L tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SDIU.L and 0.65% for SILG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDIU.L and SILG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer