SDIP.L vs. VHYA.L
SDIP.L (Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing) and VHYA.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) are both Dividend funds - SDIP.L tracks the Solactive Global SuperDividend Index while VHYA.L tracks the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SDIP.L returned 4.11%/yr vs 15.95%/yr for VHYA.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SDIP.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for VHYA.L.
Performance
SDIP.L vs. VHYA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SDIP.L is traded in GBP, while VHYA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VHYA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDIP.L achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly lower than VHYA.L's 11.44% return.
SDIP.L
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- YTD
- 2.65%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 15.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VHYA.L
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- 11.44%
- 6M
- 12.89%
- 1Y
- 28.23%
- 3Y*
- 15.95%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- —
SDIP.L vs. VHYA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDIP.L Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 2.65% | 7.51% | -2.89% | -9.44% | -23.51% |
VHYA.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 11.44% | 17.97% | 11.17% | 5.72% | 4.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDIP.L and VHYA.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.54 |
The correlation between SDIP.L and VHYA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.56 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SDIP.L vs. VHYA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDIP.L
VHYA.L
Real Estate
Energy
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Technology
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
SDIP.L
VHYA.L
Energy
SDIP.L
VHYA.L
Industrials
SDIP.L
VHYA.L
Financial Services
SDIP.L
VHYA.L
Communication Services
SDIP.L
VHYA.L
Consumer Cyclical
SDIP.L
VHYA.L
Consumer Defensive
SDIP.L
VHYA.L
Basic Materials
SDIP.L
VHYA.L
Technology
SDIP.L
VHYA.L
Healthcare
SDIP.L
VHYA.L
Utilities
SDIP.L
VHYA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDIP.L vs. VHYA.L — Risk / Return Rank
SDIP.L
VHYA.L
SDIP.L vs. VHYA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing (SDIP.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VHYA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDIP.L | VHYA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.46 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 3.94 | -1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.28 | 15.00 | -7.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDIP.L | VHYA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 2.53 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | 0.66 | -1.07 |
Drawdowns
SDIP.L vs. VHYA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDIP.L drawdown since its inception was -42.74%, which is greater than VHYA.L's maximum drawdown of -28.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDIP.L and VHYA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDIP.L | VHYA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.74% | -28.53% | -14.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.25% | -7.25% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.84% | -12.61% | -9.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.76% | 0.00% | -25.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.04% | -3.57% | -23.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 1.91% | +0.18% |
Volatility
SDIP.L vs. VHYA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing (SDIP.L) is 2.17%, while Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VHYA.L) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that SDIP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VHYA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDIP.L | VHYA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.17% | 3.05% | -0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.75% | 8.57% | -1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.65% | 11.33% | -1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 12.40% | +3.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 15.25% | +1.03% |
SDIP.L vs. VHYA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDIP.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VHYA.L's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDIP.L vs. VHYA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SDIP.L nor VHYA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDIP.L Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.61% | 2.00% | 0.09% |
VHYA.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDIP.L and VHYA.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VHYA.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VHYA.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SDIP.L.
SDIP.L tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend Index, while VHYA.L tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SDIP.L and 0.29% for VHYA.L.
Find the right allocation for SDIP.L and VHYA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer