PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SDIP.L vs. VAPX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SDIP.L vs. VAPX.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SDIP.L (Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing) and VAPX.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing) are both exchange-traded funds - SDIP.L is a Dividend fund tracking the Solactive Global SuperDividend Index, while VAPX.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SDIP.L returned 4.11%/yr vs 25.97%/yr for VAPX.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SDIP.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VAPX.L.

Performance

SDIP.L vs. VAPX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing (SDIP.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDIP.L achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly lower than VAPX.L's 53.59% return.

SDIP.L

1D
-1.03%
1M
-3.81%
YTD
2.65%
6M
0.82%
1Y
15.25%
3Y*
4.11%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

VAPX.L

1D
-0.42%
1M
18.56%
YTD
53.59%
6M
59.45%
1Y
92.00%
3Y*
25.97%
5Y*
13.40%
10Y*
13.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDIP.L vs. VAPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SDIP.L
Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing		2.65%7.51%-2.89%-9.44%-23.51%
VAPX.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing		53.59%30.80%-3.74%3.63%0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between SDIP.L and VAPX.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022

0.54

The correlation between SDIP.L and VAPX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SDIP.L vs. VAPX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SDIP.L
VAPX.L

Real Estate

36.4%
4.9%

Energy

17.8%
2.3%

Industrials

15.0%
12.5%

Financial Services

9.0%
25.3%

Communication Services

6.0%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
2.5%

Basic Materials

2.9%
9.5%

Technology

1.5%
30.2%

Healthcare

1.2%
3.3%

Utilities

1.0%
2.0%

Real Estate

SDIP.L
36.4%
VAPX.L
4.9%

Energy

SDIP.L
17.8%
VAPX.L
2.3%

Industrials

SDIP.L
15.0%
VAPX.L
12.5%

Financial Services

SDIP.L
9.0%
VAPX.L
25.3%

Communication Services

SDIP.L
6.0%
VAPX.L
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SDIP.L
5.5%
VAPX.L
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

SDIP.L
3.7%
VAPX.L
2.5%

Basic Materials

SDIP.L
2.9%
VAPX.L
9.5%

Technology

SDIP.L
1.5%
VAPX.L
30.2%

Healthcare

SDIP.L
1.2%
VAPX.L
3.3%

Utilities

SDIP.L
1.0%
VAPX.L
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing

Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing

Often compared with SDIP.L:
SDIP.L vs. JEGP.LSDIP.L vs. JEQP.LSDIP.L vs. EMHD.LSDIP.L vs. JEPQSDIP.L vs. TDGB.LSDIP.L vs. COPG.LSDIP.L vs. HDEM.L
Often compared with VAPX.L:
VAPX.L vs. HMXJ.LVAPX.L vs. VFEG.LVAPX.L vs. V3PA.DEVAPX.L vs. EIXVAPX.L vs. INAA.LVAPX.L vs. VTVAPX.L vs. SPHD

Return for Risk

SDIP.L vs. VAPX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SDIP.L
SDIP.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SDIP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDIP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDIP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SDIP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDIP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
VAPX.L
VAPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
VAPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDIP.L vs. VAPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing (SDIP.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SDIP.LVAPX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.57
4.58

-3.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.23
5.49

-3.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.83

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

6.79

-4.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.28

25.63

-18.36

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SDIP.L vs. VAPX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDIP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the VAPX.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDIP.L and VAPX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SDIP.LVAPX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

4.58

-3.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.84

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.77

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.41

0.55

-0.97

Drawdowns

SDIP.L vs. VAPX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDIP.L drawdown since its inception was -42.74%, which is greater than VAPX.L's maximum drawdown of -30.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDIP.L and VAPX.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SDIP.LVAPX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.74%

-30.88%

-11.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.25%

-13.47%

+7.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.84%

-16.88%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-18.04%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-30.88%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.76%

-0.42%

-25.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.04%

-6.47%

-20.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

3.58%

-1.49%

Volatility

SDIP.L vs. VAPX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing (SDIP.L) is 2.17%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) has a volatility of 9.91%. This indicates that SDIP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VAPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SDIP.LVAPX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.17%

9.91%

-7.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.75%

17.56%

-10.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.65%

20.00%

-10.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.28%

15.94%

+0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.28%

17.36%

-1.08%

SDIP.L vs. VAPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDIP.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VAPX.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

SDIP.L vs. VAPX.L - Dividend Comparison

SDIP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VAPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SDIP.L
Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing		0.00%0.00%6.61%2.00%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VAPX.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing		1.49%2.36%3.20%3.30%4.12%2.99%1.81%3.28%3.55%3.07%2.71%3.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

SDIP.L and VAPX.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VAPX.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VAPX.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SDIP.L.

SDIP.L is categorized as Dividend, while VAPX.L is Asia Pacific Equities. SDIP.L tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend Index, while VAPX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SDIP.L and 0.15% for VAPX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDIP.L and VAPX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer