SDIP.L vs. QYLU.L
SDIP.L (Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing) and QYLU.L (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDIP.L is a Dividend fund tracking the Solactive Global SuperDividend Index, while QYLU.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SDIP.L returned 11.81%/yr vs 11.22%/yr for QYLU.L. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SDIP.L vs. QYLU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SDIP.L is traded in GBP, while QYLU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QYLU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SDIP.L having a 7.74% return and QYLU.L slightly lower at 7.48%.
SDIP.L
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 7.74%
- 1Y
- 15.72%
- 3Y*
- 11.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLU.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 5.44%
- YTD
- 7.48%
- 1Y
- 18.48%
- 3Y*
- 11.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDIP.L vs. QYLU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDIP.L Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 7.74% | 18.63% | 1.62% | 0.39% | -0.46% |
QYLU.L Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF | 7.48% | -1.93% | 25.08% | 16.46% | -3.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDIP.L and QYLU.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2022 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDIP.L vs. QYLU.L — Risk / Return Rank
SDIP.L
QYLU.L
SDIP.L vs. QYLU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing (SDIP.L) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF (QYLU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDIP.L | QYLU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.26 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 4.69 | -1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.61 | 11.77 | -3.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDIP.L vs. QYLU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDIP.L drawdown since its inception was -27.38%, which is greater than QYLU.L's maximum drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDIP.L and QYLU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDIP.L | QYLU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.38% | -22.59% | -4.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.35% | -4.02% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.52% | -22.59% | +5.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.61% | -2.57% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.90% | -4.77% | -8.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 1.60% | +0.22% |
Volatility
SDIP.L vs. QYLU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing (SDIP.L) is 2.29%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF (QYLU.L) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that SDIP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDIP.L | QYLU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.29% | 5.04% | -2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.58% | 9.83% | -3.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.35% | 13.91% | -4.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 16.13% | -0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 16.13% | -0.14% |
Dividends
SDIP.L vs. QYLU.L - Dividend Comparison
SDIP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, while QYLU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLU.L Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDIP.L Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 9.36% | 9.39% | 11.34% | 12.51% | 8.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDIP.L and QYLU.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDIP.L is categorized as Dividend, while QYLU.L is Global Equities. SDIP.L tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend Index, while QYLU.L tracks Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF.
Find the right allocation for SDIP.L and QYLU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer