SDIA.L vs. VUCP.L
SDIA.L (iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)) and VUCP.L (Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing) are both Corporate Bonds funds - SDIA.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD while VUCP.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SDIA.L returned 2.40%/yr vs -0.05%/yr for VUCP.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SDIA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VUCP.L.
Performance
SDIA.L vs. VUCP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SDIA.L is traded in USD, while VUCP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUCP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDIA.L achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly higher than VUCP.L's -0.21% return.
SDIA.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 4.27%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- 2.40%
- 10Y*
- —
VUCP.L
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 4.40%
- 3Y*
- 4.50%
- 5Y*
- -0.05%
- 10Y*
- 1.95%
SDIA.L vs. VUCP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDIA.L iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.79% | 6.17% | 4.99% | 5.64% | -4.49% | -0.70% | 4.50% | 6.12% | 0.82% | 0.92% |
VUCP.L Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing | -0.21% | 6.57% | 2.58% | 6.64% | -15.50% | -1.53% | 8.17% | 14.64% | -3.57% | 3.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDIA.L and VUCP.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2017 | 0.49 |
The correlation between SDIA.L and VUCP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.57 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDIA.L vs. VUCP.L — Risk / Return Rank
SDIA.L
VUCP.L
SDIA.L vs. VUCP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (SDIA.L) and Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUCP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDIA.L | VUCP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.13 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.17 | 1.32 | +2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.33 | 3.99 | +12.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDIA.L | VUCP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 0.80 | +1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | -0.01 | +0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.30 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
SDIA.L vs. VUCP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDIA.L drawdown since its inception was -12.55%, smaller than the maximum VUCP.L drawdown of -22.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDIA.L and VUCP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDIA.L | VUCP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.55% | -22.06% | +9.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.02% | -3.31% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.32% | -6.13% | +4.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.61% | -21.99% | +14.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -3.31% | +3.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.17% | -5.68% | +4.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.26% | 1.10% | -0.84% |
Volatility
SDIA.L vs. VUCP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (SDIA.L) is 0.83%, while Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUCP.L) has a volatility of 1.74%. This indicates that SDIA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUCP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDIA.L | VUCP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.83% | 1.74% | -0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.51% | 4.11% | -2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84% | 5.52% | -3.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.62% | 7.64% | -5.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.44% | 7.73% | -4.29% |
SDIA.L vs. VUCP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDIA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VUCP.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SDIA.L vs. VUCP.L - Dividend Comparison
SDIA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUCP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDIA.L iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUCP.L Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing | 3.85% | 4.02% | 4.73% | 3.57% | 2.79% | 1.85% | 2.36% | 2.64% | 2.58% | 2.57% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDIA.L and VUCP.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUCP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUCP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SDIA.L.
SDIA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while VUCP.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SDIA.L and 0.09% for VUCP.L.
Find the right allocation for SDIA.L and VUCP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer