SDIA.L vs. HYGB.L
SDIA.L (iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)) and HYGB.L (VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SDIA.L is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while HYGB.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofAML Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SDIA.L returned 2.49%/yr vs 2.83%/yr for HYGB.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SDIA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for HYGB.L.
Performance
SDIA.L vs. HYGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SDIA.L is traded in USD, while HYGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HYGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDIA.L achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than HYGB.L's 3.68% return.
SDIA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 3.90%
- 3Y*
- 5.19%
- 5Y*
- 2.49%
- 10Y*
- —
HYGB.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 3.05%
- YTD
- 3.68%
- 1Y
- 8.03%
- 3Y*
- 10.31%
- 5Y*
- 2.83%
- 10Y*
- —
SDIA.L vs. HYGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDIA.L iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 1.11% | 6.22% | 4.94% | 5.68% | -4.49% | -0.70% | 4.50% | 6.15% | 1.80% |
HYGB.L VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 3.68% | 9.22% | 11.83% | 7.02% | -12.94% | -0.32% | 5.02% | 15.45% | -30.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDIA.L and HYGB.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2018 | 0.13 |
The correlation between SDIA.L and HYGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDIA.L vs. HYGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
SDIA.L
HYGB.L
SDIA.L vs. HYGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (SDIA.L) and VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HYGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDIA.L | HYGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.29 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 2.75 | +0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.59 | 12.04 | +1.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDIA.L vs. HYGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDIA.L drawdown since its inception was -12.55%, smaller than the maximum HYGB.L drawdown of -37.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDIA.L and HYGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDIA.L | HYGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.55% | -37.51% | +24.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.10% | -2.91% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.32% | -4.72% | +3.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.61% | -25.04% | +17.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.00% | -3.40% | +3.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.15% | -21.18% | +20.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.29% | 0.67% | -0.38% |
Volatility
SDIA.L vs. HYGB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (SDIA.L) is 0.73%, while VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HYGB.L) has a volatility of 1.31%. This indicates that SDIA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDIA.L | HYGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.73% | 1.31% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.81% | 4.67% | -2.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21% | 5.35% | -3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.78% | 17.85% | -15.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.50% | 17.17% | -13.67% |
SDIA.L vs. HYGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDIA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HYGB.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDIA.L vs. HYGB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SDIA.L nor HYGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SDIA.L and HYGB.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SDIA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SDIA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HYGB.L.
SDIA.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while HYGB.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. SDIA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while HYGB.L tracks ICE BofAML Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SDIA.L and 0.40% for HYGB.L.
Find the right allocation for SDIA.L and HYGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer