PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDHG.L vs. HYSD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDHG.L vs. HYSD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SDHG.L) and iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (HYSD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDHG.L achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly higher than HYSD.L's 1.76% return.


SDHG.L

1D
0.08%
1M
-1.28%
6M
1.92%
YTD
2.20%
1Y
6.08%
3Y*
5.74%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
4.47%
ALL TIME*
1.82%

HYSD.L

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.10%
6M
1.29%
YTD
1.76%
1Y
5.27%
3Y*
7.92%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDHG.L vs. HYSD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SDHG.L
iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
2.20%1.29%8.41%2.88%1.08%
HYSD.L
iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
1.76%8.24%7.60%11.75%-3.60%

Correlation

The correlation between SDHG.L and HYSD.L is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2022

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDHG.L vs. HYSD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDHG.L
SDHG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SDHG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDHG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDHG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SDHG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDHG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

HYSD.L
HYSD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
HYSD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYSD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYSD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
HYSD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYSD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDHG.L vs. HYSD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SDHG.L) and iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (HYSD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDHG.LHYSD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.27

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

2.17

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.68

9.54

-4.86

SDHG.L vs. HYSD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDHG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the HYSD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDHG.L and HYSD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDHG.L vs. HYSD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDHG.L drawdown since its inception was -39.18%, which is greater than HYSD.L's maximum drawdown of -9.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDHG.L and HYSD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDHG.LHYSD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.18%

-9.53%

-29.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.79%

-2.42%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.95%

-5.02%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

-0.30%

-1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.47%

-1.50%

-10.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

0.55%

+0.75%

Volatility

SDHG.L vs. HYSD.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SDHG.L) has a higher volatility of 1.38% compared to iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (HYSD.L) at 0.94%. This indicates that SDHG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYSD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDHG.LHYSD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

0.94%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.14%

3.13%

+1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.81%

3.88%

+1.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.49%

6.08%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.64%

6.08%

+2.56%

SDHG.L vs. HYSD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDHG.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than HYSD.L's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDHG.L vs. HYSD.L - Dividend Comparison

SDHG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.77%, less than HYSD.L's 7.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYSD.L
iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
7.40%7.39%7.39%5.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SDHG.L
iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
6.77%6.56%6.32%5.63%4.24%4.19%5.08%5.39%5.41%5.60%5.32%4.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDHG.L and HYSD.L have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HYSD.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HYSD.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SDHG.L.

SDHG.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while HYSD.L tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SDHG.L and 0.22% for HYSD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDHG.L and HYSD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer