PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYSD.L vs. DHYG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYSD.L vs. DHYG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (HYSD.L) and iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (DHYG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYSD.L achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly higher than DHYG.L's 1.35% return.


HYSD.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.31%
6M
1.29%
YTD
1.97%
1Y
5.49%
3Y*
7.99%
5Y*
10Y*

DHYG.L

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.00%
6M
1.12%
YTD
1.35%
1Y
5.44%
3Y*
7.76%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYSD.L vs. DHYG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HYSD.L
iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
1.97%8.24%7.60%11.75%-3.60%
DHYG.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
1.35%8.70%7.73%10.76%-4.08%

Correlation

The correlation between HYSD.L and DHYG.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2022

0.78

The correlation between HYSD.L and DHYG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYSD.L vs. DHYG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYSD.L
HYSD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
HYSD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYSD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYSD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HYSD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYSD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

DHYG.L
DHYG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
DHYG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHYG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHYG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
DHYG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHYG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYSD.L vs. DHYG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (HYSD.L) and iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (DHYG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYSD.LDHYG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

2.03

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.94

8.62

+1.32

HYSD.L vs. DHYG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYSD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the DHYG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYSD.L and DHYG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYSD.L vs. DHYG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYSD.L drawdown since its inception was -9.53%, smaller than the maximum DHYG.L drawdown of -17.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYSD.L and DHYG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYSD.LDHYG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.53%

-17.27%

+7.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.42%

-2.67%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.02%

-4.39%

-0.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.47%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.50%

-4.90%

+3.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

0.63%

-0.08%

Volatility

HYSD.L vs. DHYG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (HYSD.L) has a higher volatility of 0.91% compared to iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (DHYG.L) at 0.80%. This indicates that HYSD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHYG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYSD.LDHYG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

0.80%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.13%

3.09%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88%

4.05%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.08%

6.88%

-0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.08%

6.88%

-0.80%

HYSD.L vs. DHYG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYSD.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than DHYG.L's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HYSD.L vs. DHYG.L - Dividend Comparison

HYSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.39%, more than DHYG.L's 6.81% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DHYG.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
6.81%6.70%7.02%6.41%6.51%
HYSD.L
iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
7.39%7.39%7.39%5.61%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYSD.L and DHYG.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HYSD.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HYSD.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for DHYG.L.

HYSD.L tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index, while DHYG.L tracks Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate High Yield ESG SRI Bond Index (USD). Their fees differ too: 0.22% for HYSD.L and 0.27% for DHYG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYSD.L and DHYG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer