PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDHA.L vs. STEA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDHA.L vs. STEA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDHA.L) and PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Hedged) Acc (STEA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SDHA.L is traded in USD, while STEA.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the STEA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDHA.L achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly higher than STEA.L's -1.66% return.


SDHA.L

1D
0.14%
1M
0.14%
6M
1.54%
YTD
1.82%
1Y
6.13%
3Y*
7.33%
5Y*
4.63%
10Y*

STEA.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.06%
6M
-0.89%
YTD
-1.66%
1Y
3.03%
3Y*
7.04%
5Y*
2.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDHA.L vs. STEA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SDHA.L
iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
1.82%9.01%6.50%8.96%-3.48%3.62%3.98%9.51%-0.68%
STEA.L
PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Hedged) Acc
-1.66%20.91%0.06%12.59%-12.51%-3.61%10.46%4.72%-5.09%

Correlation

The correlation between SDHA.L and STEA.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2018

0.56

The correlation between SDHA.L and STEA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDHA.L vs. STEA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDHA.L
SDHA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SDHA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDHA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDHA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SDHA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDHA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

STEA.L
STEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
STEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
STEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
STEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
STEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDHA.L vs. STEA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDHA.L) and PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Hedged) Acc (STEA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDHA.LSTEA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.06

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

0.39

+2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.14

0.90

+13.24

SDHA.L vs. STEA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDHA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the STEA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDHA.L and STEA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDHA.L vs. STEA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDHA.L drawdown since its inception was -17.77%, smaller than the maximum STEA.L drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDHA.L and STEA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDHA.LSTEA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.77%

-31.34%

+13.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.95%

-6.67%

+4.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.48%

-8.17%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.30%

-27.26%

+18.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-4.39%

+4.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.23%

-8.20%

+6.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

2.92%

-2.49%

Volatility

SDHA.L vs. STEA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDHA.L) is 0.92%, while PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Hedged) Acc (STEA.L) has a volatility of 1.69%. This indicates that SDHA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STEA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDHA.LSTEA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

1.69%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

5.91%

-2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.60%

7.79%

-4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.54%

10.55%

-5.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.39%

10.81%

-4.42%

Dividends

SDHA.L vs. STEA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SDHA.L nor STEA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SDHA.L and STEA.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDHA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while STEA.L tracks PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Hedged) Acc. They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDHA.L and STEA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer