PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDHA.L vs. JHYP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDHA.L vs. JHYP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDHA.L) and JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF - GBP Hedged (dist) (JHYP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SDHA.L is traded in USD, while JHYP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the JHYP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDHA.L achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than JHYP.L's 1.89% return.


SDHA.L

1D
0.14%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.56%
6M
2.20%
1Y
7.09%
3Y*
7.71%
5Y*
4.65%
10Y*

JHYP.L

1D
0.18%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
1.89%
6M
3.64%
1Y
7.39%
3Y*
11.55%
5Y*
2.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDHA.L vs. JHYP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SDHA.L
iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
1.56%8.87%6.63%8.90%-3.48%3.62%11.38%
JHYP.L
JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF - GBP Hedged (dist)
1.89%17.50%5.90%15.59%-19.64%2.04%24.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SDHA.L and JHYP.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020

0.56

The correlation between SDHA.L and JHYP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDHA.L vs. JHYP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDHA.L
SDHA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SDHA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDHA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDHA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SDHA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDHA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

JHYP.L
JHYP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
JHYP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHYP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHYP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
JHYP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHYP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDHA.L vs. JHYP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDHA.L) and JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF - GBP Hedged (dist) (JHYP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDHA.LJHYP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.15

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

1.11

+2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.08

3.30

+13.78

SDHA.L vs. JHYP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDHA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the JHYP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDHA.L and JHYP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDHA.LJHYP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

0.86

+1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.22

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.58

+0.17

Drawdowns

SDHA.L vs. JHYP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDHA.L drawdown since its inception was -17.77%, smaller than the maximum JHYP.L drawdown of -34.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDHA.L and JHYP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDHA.LJHYP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.77%

-34.73%

+16.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.85%

-6.61%

+4.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.57%

-10.10%

+5.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.30%

-34.73%

+26.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-1.48%

+1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

-8.44%

+7.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

2.23%

-1.82%

Volatility

SDHA.L vs. JHYP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDHA.L) is 1.32%, while JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF - GBP Hedged (dist) (JHYP.L) has a volatility of 2.38%. This indicates that SDHA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JHYP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDHA.LJHYP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

2.38%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.69%

6.02%

-3.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33%

8.54%

-5.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.49%

11.85%

-6.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.39%

11.73%

-5.34%

SDHA.L vs. JHYP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDHA.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than JHYP.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDHA.L vs. JHYP.L - Dividend Comparison

SDHA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JHYP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.97%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
JHYP.L
JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF - GBP Hedged (dist)
5.97%6.58%5.96%8.55%5.62%4.37%0.69%
SDHA.L
iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDHA.L and JHYP.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JHYP.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JHYP.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SDHA.L.

SDHA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while JHYP.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR HGBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SDHA.L and 0.35% for JHYP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDHA.L and JHYP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer