PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDHA.L vs. IHYA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDHA.L vs. IHYA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDHA.L) and iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IHYA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDHA.L achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly higher than IHYA.L's 1.10% return.


SDHA.L

1D
0.14%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.56%
6M
2.20%
1Y
7.09%
3Y*
7.71%
5Y*
4.65%
10Y*

IHYA.L

1D
0.09%
1M
0.19%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.75%
1Y
6.94%
3Y*
8.29%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDHA.L vs. IHYA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SDHA.L
iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
1.56%8.87%6.63%8.90%-3.48%3.62%3.98%9.51%-0.74%
IHYA.L
iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
1.10%9.49%6.98%10.64%-8.87%3.72%5.07%12.63%-1.35%

Correlation

The correlation between SDHA.L and IHYA.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2018

0.87

The correlation between SDHA.L and IHYA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

SDHA.L vs. IHYA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDHA.L
IHYA.L

Utilities

77.9%
83.6%

Real Estate

22.1%
16.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

SDHA.L
77.9%
IHYA.L
83.6%

Real Estate

SDHA.L
22.1%
IHYA.L
16.4%

Basic Materials

SDHA.L

-

IHYA.L

-

Communication Services

SDHA.L

-

IHYA.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

SDHA.L

-

IHYA.L

-

Consumer Defensive

SDHA.L

-

IHYA.L

-

Energy

SDHA.L

-

IHYA.L

-

Financial Services

SDHA.L

-

IHYA.L

-

Healthcare

SDHA.L

-

IHYA.L

-

Industrials

SDHA.L

-

IHYA.L

-

Technology

SDHA.L

-

IHYA.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDHA.L vs. IHYA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDHA.L
SDHA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SDHA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDHA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDHA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SDHA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDHA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

IHYA.L
IHYA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IHYA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHYA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHYA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IHYA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHYA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDHA.L vs. IHYA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDHA.L) and iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IHYA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDHA.LIHYA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.38

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

2.45

+1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.08

12.30

+4.78

SDHA.L vs. IHYA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDHA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the IHYA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDHA.L and IHYA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDHA.LIHYA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

1.93

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.59

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.56

+0.19

Drawdowns

SDHA.L vs. IHYA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDHA.L drawdown since its inception was -17.77%, smaller than the maximum IHYA.L drawdown of -22.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDHA.L and IHYA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDHA.LIHYA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.77%

-22.58%

+4.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.85%

-2.82%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.57%

-4.83%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.30%

-13.68%

+5.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.31%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

-2.23%

+0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

0.56%

-0.15%

Volatility

SDHA.L vs. IHYA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDHA.L) and iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IHYA.L) have volatilities of 1.32% and 1.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDHA.LIHYA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

1.36%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.69%

2.87%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33%

3.58%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.49%

6.81%

-1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.39%

7.89%

-1.50%

SDHA.L vs. IHYA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDHA.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than IHYA.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDHA.L vs. IHYA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SDHA.L nor IHYA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SDHA.L and IHYA.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SDHA.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SDHA.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IHYA.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SDHA.L and 0.50% for IHYA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDHA.L and IHYA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer