PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDHA.L vs. GHYU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDHA.L vs. GHYU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDHA.L) and Lyxor Global High Yield Sustainable Exposure UCITS ETF - Acc (GHYU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDHA.L achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly higher than GHYU.L's 0.65% return.


SDHA.L

1D
0.14%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.56%
6M
2.20%
1Y
7.09%
3Y*
7.71%
5Y*
4.65%
10Y*

GHYU.L

1D
0.12%
1M
0.39%
YTD
0.65%
6M
1.45%
1Y
6.23%
3Y*
8.58%
5Y*
2.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDHA.L vs. GHYU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SDHA.L
iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
1.56%8.87%6.63%8.90%-3.48%3.62%3.24%
GHYU.L
Lyxor Global High Yield Sustainable Exposure UCITS ETF - Acc
0.65%11.40%5.06%12.36%-13.13%0.31%8.39%

Correlation

The correlation between SDHA.L and GHYU.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2020

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between SDHA.L and GHYU.L has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDHA.L vs. GHYU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDHA.L
SDHA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SDHA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDHA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDHA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SDHA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDHA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

GHYU.L
GHYU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GHYU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHYU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHYU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GHYU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHYU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDHA.L vs. GHYU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDHA.L) and Lyxor Global High Yield Sustainable Exposure UCITS ETF - Acc (GHYU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDHA.LGHYU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.23

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

1.58

+2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.08

6.21

+10.87

SDHA.L vs. GHYU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDHA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the GHYU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDHA.L and GHYU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDHA.LGHYU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

1.29

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.36

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.41

+0.35

Drawdowns

SDHA.L vs. GHYU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDHA.L drawdown since its inception was -17.77%, smaller than the maximum GHYU.L drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDHA.L and GHYU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDHA.LGHYU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.77%

-22.36%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.85%

-3.92%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.57%

-4.67%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.30%

-22.36%

+14.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.49%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

-5.60%

+4.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

1.00%

-0.59%

Volatility

SDHA.L vs. GHYU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDHA.L) is 1.32%, while Lyxor Global High Yield Sustainable Exposure UCITS ETF - Acc (GHYU.L) has a volatility of 1.69%. This indicates that SDHA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GHYU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDHA.LGHYU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

1.69%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.69%

3.74%

-1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33%

4.83%

-1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.49%

7.34%

-1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.39%

8.94%

-2.55%

SDHA.L vs. GHYU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDHA.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than GHYU.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDHA.L vs. GHYU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SDHA.L nor GHYU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SDHA.L and GHYU.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GHYU.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GHYU.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SDHA.L.

SDHA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while GHYU.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SDHA.L and 0.25% for GHYU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDHA.L and GHYU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer