SDHA.L vs. GHYS.L
SDHA.L (iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and GHYS.L (iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds from iShares - SDHA.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD while GHYS.L tracks the Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets Liquid High Yield Capped Index (GBP Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SDHA.L returned 4.65%/yr vs 2.43%/yr for GHYS.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SDHA.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for GHYS.L.
Performance
SDHA.L vs. GHYS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SDHA.L is traded in USD, while GHYS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GHYS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDHA.L achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly higher than GHYS.L's 1.07% return.
SDHA.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 7.09%
- 3Y*
- 7.71%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- —
GHYS.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- 1.07%
- 6M
- 2.37%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- 10.65%
- 5Y*
- 2.43%
- 10Y*
- 3.33%
SDHA.L vs. GHYS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDHA.L iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.56% | 8.87% | 6.63% | 8.90% | -3.48% | 3.62% | 3.98% | 9.51% | -0.74% |
GHYS.L iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF | 1.07% | 15.68% | 5.17% | 17.49% | -19.52% | 2.66% | 5.85% | 15.55% | -5.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDHA.L and GHYS.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2018 | 0.54 |
The correlation between SDHA.L and GHYS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SDHA.L vs. GHYS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDHA.L
GHYS.L
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
SDHA.L
GHYS.L
Real Estate
SDHA.L
GHYS.L
Basic Materials
SDHA.L
-
GHYS.L
-
Communication Services
SDHA.L
-
GHYS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SDHA.L
-
GHYS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SDHA.L
-
GHYS.L
-
Energy
SDHA.L
-
GHYS.L
-
Financial Services
SDHA.L
-
GHYS.L
-
Healthcare
SDHA.L
-
GHYS.L
-
Industrials
SDHA.L
-
GHYS.L
-
Technology
SDHA.L
-
GHYS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDHA.L vs. GHYS.L — Risk / Return Rank
SDHA.L
GHYS.L
SDHA.L vs. GHYS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDHA.L) and iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (GHYS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDHA.L | GHYS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.10 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 0.69 | +3.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.08 | 1.95 | +15.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDHA.L | GHYS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 0.54 | +1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.20 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.24 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
SDHA.L vs. GHYS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDHA.L drawdown since its inception was -17.77%, smaller than the maximum GHYS.L drawdown of -39.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDHA.L and GHYS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDHA.L | GHYS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.77% | -39.19% | +21.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.85% | -6.63% | +4.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.57% | -9.20% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.30% | -34.08% | +25.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -2.42% | +2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.25% | -11.07% | +9.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.41% | 2.36% | -1.95% |
Volatility
SDHA.L vs. GHYS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDHA.L) is 1.32%, while iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (GHYS.L) has a volatility of 2.34%. This indicates that SDHA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GHYS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDHA.L | GHYS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.32% | 2.34% | -1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.69% | 6.55% | -3.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.33% | 8.45% | -5.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.49% | 11.93% | -6.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.39% | 13.23% | -6.84% |
SDHA.L vs. GHYS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDHA.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GHYS.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDHA.L vs. GHYS.L - Dividend Comparison
SDHA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GHYS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHYS.L iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF | 5.73% | 5.68% | 5.78% | 5.36% | 4.41% | 3.78% | 4.08% | 5.03% | 4.89% | 4.58% | 4.91% | 5.65% |
SDHA.L iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDHA.L and GHYS.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SDHA.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SDHA.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for GHYS.L.
SDHA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while GHYS.L tracks Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets Liquid High Yield Capped Index (GBP Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SDHA.L and 0.55% for GHYS.L.
Find the right allocation for SDHA.L and GHYS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer