PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDFI vs. IVES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDFI vs. IVES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Short Duration Income ETF (SDFI) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDFI achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than IVES's 18.82% return.


SDFI

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.86%
6M
1.16%
1Y
4.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IVES

1D
-1.24%
1M
0.83%
YTD
18.82%
6M
16.32%
1Y
45.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDFI vs. IVES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SDFI
AB Short Duration Income ETF
0.86%3.62%
IVES
Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF
18.82%25.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SDFI and IVES is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDFI vs. IVES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDFI
SDFI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SDFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDFI Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SDFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDFI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IVES
IVES Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IVES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVES Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVES Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IVES Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVES Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDFI vs. IVES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Short Duration Income ETF (SDFI) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDFIIVESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.29

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

2.03

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.75

5.57

+8.17

SDFI vs. IVES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDFI Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the IVES Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDFI and IVES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDFI vs. IVES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDFI drawdown since its inception was -1.21%, smaller than the maximum IVES drawdown of -22.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDFI and IVES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDFIIVESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.21%

-22.64%

+21.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.20%

-22.64%

+21.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-9.99%

+9.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.22%

-5.80%

+5.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

8.25%

-7.95%

Volatility

SDFI vs. IVES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Short Duration Income ETF (SDFI) is 0.61%, while Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES) has a volatility of 11.55%. This indicates that SDFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDFIIVESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

11.55%

-10.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.40%

21.29%

-19.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06%

27.03%

-24.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.48%

26.59%

-24.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.48%

26.59%

-24.11%

SDFI vs. IVES - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDFI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than IVES's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDFI vs. IVES - Dividend Comparison

SDFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than IVES's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
IVES
Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF
0.35%0.41%0.00%
SDFI
AB Short Duration Income ETF
4.61%4.66%3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDFI and IVES have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVES has higher volatility (11.55%) compared to SDFI (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDFI dropped -1.21% vs IVES's -22.64%.

On 1-year performance, IVES leads with 45.84% vs 4.06% for SDFI. On fees, SDFI is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SDFI has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IVES has performed better with a 45.84% return vs 4.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SDFI is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVES.

SDFI has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 0.35% for IVES.

SDFI is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while IVES is Technology Equities. SDFI tracks Actively Managed, while IVES tracks Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Wedbush. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SDFI and 0.75% for IVES.

SDFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDFI and IVES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer