SDD vs. ZIVB
SDD (ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600) and ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. SDD is passively managed, while ZIVB is actively managed. SDD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for ZIVB.
Performance
SDD vs. ZIVB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SDD
- 1D
- 3.63%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- -23.94%
- 6M
- -22.77%
- 1Y
- -41.53%
- 3Y*
- -23.30%
- 5Y*
- -14.95%
- 10Y*
- -26.75%
ZIVB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDD vs. ZIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SDD ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 | 2.51% |
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDD vs. ZIVB — Risk / Return Rank
SDD
ZIVB
SDD vs. ZIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 (SDD) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDD | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.56 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDD | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | — | — |
Drawdowns
SDD vs. ZIVB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDD drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, which is greater than ZIVB's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDD and ZIVB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDD | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.93% | 0.00% | -99.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.93% | 0.00% | -99.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.92% | 0.00% | -86.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.68% | — | — |
Volatility
SDD vs. ZIVB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDD | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.35% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.32% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.17% | 0.00% | +36.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.23% | 0.00% | +43.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.16% | 0.00% | +45.16% |
SDD vs. ZIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than ZIVB's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDD vs. ZIVB - Dividend Comparison
SDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, while ZIVB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDD ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 | 6.11% | 5.07% | 4.34% | 3.84% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.20% | 0.52% |
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, SDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.
SDD has the higher dividend yield at 6.11%, compared with 0.00% for ZIVB.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SDD and 1.35% for ZIVB.
Find the right allocation for SDD and ZIVB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer