PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDCI vs. ZSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SDCI vs. ZSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) and USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund (ZSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SDCI vs. ZSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
22.70%17.60%17.91%-3.44%
ZSC
USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund
5.05%28.43%-14.39%-10.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDCI achieves a 22.70% return, which is significantly higher than ZSC's 5.05% return.


SDCI

1D
-0.77%
1M
9.08%
YTD
22.70%
6M
21.72%
1Y
29.96%
3Y*
21.13%
5Y*
22.45%
10Y*

ZSC

1D
0.19%
1M
1.38%
YTD
5.05%
6M
17.84%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SDCI vs. ZSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDCI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ZSC's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SDCI vs. ZSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDCI
SDCI Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SDCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDCI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SDCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDCI Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

ZSC
ZSC Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ZSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSC Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSC Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDCI vs. ZSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) and USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund (ZSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDCIZSCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.65

2.34

-0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.16

3.03

-0.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.44

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

4.01

-1.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.09

11.98

-2.89

SDCI vs. ZSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDCI Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the ZSC Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDCI and ZSC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDCIZSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

2.34

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.10

+0.55

Correlation

The correlation between SDCI and ZSC is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SDCI vs. ZSC - Dividend Comparison

SDCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than ZSC's 1.66% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
3.00%3.68%5.92%3.46%33.49%19.26%0.20%0.93%0.68%
ZSC
USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund
1.66%1.75%2.18%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SDCI vs. ZSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDCI drawdown since its inception was -45.79%, which is greater than ZSC's maximum drawdown of -26.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDCI and ZSC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SDCIZSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.79%

-26.49%

-19.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-7.69%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-2.14%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.80%

-15.61%

+3.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

2.57%

+0.95%

Volatility

SDCI vs. ZSC - Volatility Comparison

USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) has a higher volatility of 7.05% compared to USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund (ZSC) at 3.58%. This indicates that SDCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SDCIZSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.05%

3.58%

+3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.92%

10.59%

+3.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.34%

13.56%

+4.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.45%

12.41%

+6.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

12.41%

+4.70%