SDAY.NEO vs. HPYM.TO
SDAY.NEO (Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Equity DayMAX™ ETF) and HPYM.TO (Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units) are both exchange-traded funds - SDAY.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital, while HPYM.TO is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Harvest. Both are actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SDAY.NEO charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for HPYM.TO.
Performance
SDAY.NEO vs. HPYM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDAY.NEO achieves a 12.66% return, which is significantly higher than HPYM.TO's -0.96% return.
SDAY.NEO
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 6.53%
- YTD
- 12.66%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HPYM.TO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 6M
- -0.69%
- 1Y
- 2.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDAY.NEO vs. HPYM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SDAY.NEO Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Equity DayMAX™ ETF | 12.66% | 4.49% |
HPYM.TO Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units | -0.96% | 3.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDAY.NEO and HPYM.TO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDAY.NEO vs. HPYM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SDAY.NEO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HPYM.TO
SDAY.NEO vs. HPYM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Equity DayMAX™ ETF (SDAY.NEO) and Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDAY.NEO | HPYM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.11 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.66 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.77 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDAY.NEO vs. HPYM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDAY.NEO drawdown since its inception was -7.75%, which is greater than HPYM.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDAY.NEO and HPYM.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDAY.NEO | HPYM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.75% | -6.19% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.44% | +2.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.81% | -1.95% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.45% | — |
Volatility
SDAY.NEO vs. HPYM.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDAY.NEO | HPYM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.59% | 4.49% | +7.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.59% | 5.59% | +6.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.59% | 5.59% | +6.00% |
SDAY.NEO vs. HPYM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDAY.NEO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HPYM.TO's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDAY.NEO vs. HPYM.TO - Dividend Comparison
SDAY.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.66%, more than HPYM.TO's 9.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HPYM.TO Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units | 9.35% | 9.01% | 8.07% |
SDAY.NEO Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Equity DayMAX™ ETF | 16.66% | 8.62% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDAY.NEO and HPYM.TO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HPYM.TO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HPYM.TO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SDAY.NEO.
SDAY.NEO is categorized as Derivative Income, while HPYM.TO is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for SDAY.NEO and 0.45% for HPYM.TO.
Find the right allocation for SDAY.NEO and HPYM.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer