SCYB vs. XB
SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) and XB (BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - SCYB tracks the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index while XB tracks the ICE BofA Single-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SCYB returned 6.99% vs 7.35% for XB. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCYB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for XB.
Performance
SCYB vs. XB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCYB achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than XB's 1.82% return.
SCYB
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 6.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XB
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 7.35%
- 3Y*
- 8.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCYB vs. XB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 1.55% | 8.33% | 8.15% | 6.74% |
XB BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.82% | 7.81% | 7.41% | 7.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCYB and XB is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023 | 0.83 |
The correlation between SCYB and XB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCYB vs. XB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCYB
XB
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Financial Services
Technology
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
SCYB
XB
Communication Services
SCYB
XB
Industrials
SCYB
XB
Healthcare
SCYB
XB
Energy
SCYB
XB
Financial Services
SCYB
XB
Technology
SCYB
XB
Real Estate
SCYB
XB
Basic Materials
SCYB
XB
Consumer Defensive
SCYB
XB
Utilities
SCYB
XB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCYB vs. XB — Risk / Return Rank
SCYB
XB
SCYB vs. XB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) and BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCYB | XB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.39 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 3.42 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.87 | 15.02 | -2.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCYB | XB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 1.98 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.68 | 0.84 | +0.84 |
Drawdowns
SCYB vs. XB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCYB drawdown since its inception was -4.92%, smaller than the maximum XB drawdown of -9.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCYB and XB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCYB | XB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -9.25% | +4.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.44% | -2.16% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -0.47% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -1.32% | +0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.54% | 0.49% | +0.05% |
Volatility
SCYB vs. XB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) is 1.07%, while BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XB) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that SCYB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCYB | XB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 1.36% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.93% | 2.97% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76% | 3.74% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.13% | 7.44% | -2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.13% | 7.44% | -2.31% |
SCYB vs. XB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCYB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XB's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCYB vs. XB - Dividend Comparison
SCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, less than XB's 7.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 6.94% | 6.99% | 7.06% | 3.36% | 0.00% |
XB BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 7.08% | 6.96% | 7.74% | 7.87% | 5.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCYB and XB have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XB has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to SCYB (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCYB dropped -4.92% vs XB's -9.25%.
On 1-year performance, XB leads with 7.35% vs 6.99% for SCYB. On fees, SCYB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCYB has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XB has performed better with a 7.35% return vs 6.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCYB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XB.
XB has the higher dividend yield at 7.08%, compared with 6.94% for SCYB.
SCYB tracks ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while XB tracks ICE BofA Single-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCYB and 0.30% for XB.
XB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCYB and XB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer