SCYB vs. VGHY
SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) and VGHY (Vanguard High-Yield Active ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. SCYB is passively managed, while VGHY is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCYB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for VGHY.
Performance
SCYB vs. VGHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCYB achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly higher than VGHY's 1.38% return.
SCYB
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 6.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGHY
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.38%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCYB vs. VGHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 1.55% | 1.40% |
VGHY Vanguard High-Yield Active ETF | 1.38% | 1.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCYB and VGHY is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCYB vs. VGHY — Risk / Return Rank
SCYB
VGHY
SCYB vs. VGHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) and Vanguard High-Yield Active ETF (VGHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCYB | VGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.88 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.81 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.87 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCYB | VGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.68 | 1.07 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
SCYB vs. VGHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCYB drawdown since its inception was -4.92%, which is greater than VGHY's maximum drawdown of -2.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCYB and VGHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCYB | VGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -2.66% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -0.30% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -0.45% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.54% | — | — |
Volatility
SCYB vs. VGHY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCYB | VGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.93% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76% | 4.30% | -0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.13% | 4.30% | +0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.13% | 4.30% | +0.83% |
SCYB vs. VGHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCYB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VGHY's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCYB vs. VGHY - Dividend Comparison
SCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, more than VGHY's 3.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 6.94% | 6.99% | 7.06% | 3.36% |
VGHY Vanguard High-Yield Active ETF | 3.98% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCYB and VGHY have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCYB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCYB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VGHY.
SCYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.94%, compared with 3.98% for VGHY.
They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCYB and 0.22% for VGHY.
Find the right allocation for SCYB and VGHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer