SCYB vs. NFIAX
SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) and NFIAX (Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund) are both funds - SCYB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while NFIAX is a Bank Loan fund managed by Neuberger Berman. Over the past year, SCYB returned 6.99% vs 5.28% for NFIAX. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCYB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for NFIAX.
Performance
SCYB vs. NFIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCYB achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly higher than NFIAX's 1.37% return.
SCYB
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 6.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFIAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 5.28%
- 3Y*
- 7.85%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- 4.51%
SCYB vs. NFIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 1.55% | 8.33% | 8.15% | 6.74% |
NFIAX Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund | 1.37% | 5.83% | 8.89% | 4.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCYB and NFIAX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCYB vs. NFIAX — Risk / Return Rank
SCYB
NFIAX
SCYB vs. NFIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) and Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund (NFIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCYB | NFIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 2.00 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 4.97 | -2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.87 | 17.08 | -4.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCYB | NFIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.44 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.68 | 1.25 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
SCYB vs. NFIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCYB drawdown since its inception was -4.92%, smaller than the maximum NFIAX drawdown of -22.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCYB and NFIAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCYB | NFIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -22.18% | +17.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.44% | -1.07% | -1.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -6.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -0.11% | -0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -0.83% | +0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.54% | 0.31% | +0.23% |
Volatility
SCYB vs. NFIAX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) has a higher volatility of 1.07% compared to Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund (NFIAX) at 0.59%. This indicates that SCYB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCYB | NFIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 0.59% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.93% | 1.65% | +1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76% | 2.19% | +1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.13% | 2.69% | +2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.13% | 4.02% | +1.11% |
SCYB vs. NFIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCYB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than NFIAX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCYB vs. NFIAX - Dividend Comparison
SCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, more than NFIAX's 6.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFIAX Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund | 6.59% | 6.84% | 8.05% | 6.89% | 3.97% | 3.36% | 3.68% | 4.71% | 4.32% | 3.44% | 3.46% | 4.05% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 6.94% | 6.99% | 7.06% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCYB and NFIAX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCYB has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to NFIAX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCYB dropped -4.92% vs NFIAX's -22.18%.
NFIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCYB and NFIAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer