SCYB vs. EVHY
SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) and EVHY (Eaton Vance High Yield ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. SCYB is passively managed, while EVHY is actively managed. Over the past year, SCYB returned 6.99% vs 6.59% for EVHY. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCYB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for EVHY.
Performance
SCYB vs. EVHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCYB achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly higher than EVHY's 1.09% return.
SCYB
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 6.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EVHY
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 1.09%
- 6M
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- 6.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCYB vs. EVHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 1.55% | 8.33% | 8.15% | 9.22% |
EVHY Eaton Vance High Yield ETF | 1.09% | 9.14% | 6.39% | 8.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCYB and EVHY is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SCYB and EVHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCYB vs. EVHY — Risk / Return Rank
SCYB
EVHY
SCYB vs. EVHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) and Eaton Vance High Yield ETF (EVHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCYB | EVHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.88 | 1.96 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.81 | 2.98 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.39 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 2.64 | +0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.87 | 12.77 | +0.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCYB | EVHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 1.96 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.68 | 2.19 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
SCYB vs. EVHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCYB drawdown since its inception was -4.92%, which is greater than EVHY's maximum drawdown of -3.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCYB and EVHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCYB | EVHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -3.71% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.44% | -2.51% | +0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -0.24% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -0.37% | -0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.54% | 0.52% | +0.02% |
Volatility
SCYB vs. EVHY - Volatility Comparison
Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) and Eaton Vance High Yield ETF (EVHY) have volatilities of 1.07% and 1.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCYB | EVHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 1.02% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.93% | 2.70% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76% | 3.37% | +0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.13% | 4.52% | +0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.13% | 4.52% | +0.61% |
SCYB vs. EVHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCYB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than EVHY's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCYB vs. EVHY - Dividend Comparison
SCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, less than EVHY's 7.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EVHY Eaton Vance High Yield ETF | 7.21% | 7.39% | 7.66% | 1.44% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 6.94% | 6.99% | 7.06% | 3.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCYB and EVHY have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCYB has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to EVHY (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCYB dropped -4.92% vs EVHY's -3.71%.
On 1-year performance, SCYB leads with 6.99% vs 6.59% for EVHY. On fees, SCYB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCYB has performed better with a 6.99% return vs 6.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCYB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for EVHY.
EVHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.21%, compared with 6.94% for SCYB.
They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCYB and 0.48% for EVHY.
EVHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCYB and EVHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer