SCYB vs. ESHY

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) and ESHY (Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - SCYB tracks the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index while ESHY tracks the JPMorgan ESG DM Corporate High Yield USD Index. Both are passively managed. SCYB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ESHY.

Performance

SCYB vs. ESHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) and Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (ESHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SCYB

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.88%
• 6M: 1.80%
• 1Y: 6.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ESHY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCYB vs. ESHY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF	1.36%
ESHY Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

SCYB vs. ESHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCYB

SCYB Risk / Return Rank: 62
SCYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SCYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
SCYB Omega Ratio Rank: 60
SCYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
SCYB Martin Ratio Rank: 71

ESHY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCYB vs. ESHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) and Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (ESHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCYB	ESHY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.33	—	—

Drawdowns

SCYB vs. ESHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCYB drawdown since its inception was -4.92%, which is greater than ESHY's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCYB and ESHY.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCYB	ESHY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.92%	0.00%	-4.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	0.00%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.51%	0.00%	-0.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.55%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SCYB	ESHY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.97%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.01%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.78%	0.00%	+3.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.11%	0.00%	+5.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.11%	0.00%	+5.11%

SCYB vs. ESHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCYB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ESHY's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SCYB vs. ESHY - Dividend Comparison

SCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%, while ESHY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ESHY Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF	6.91%	6.99%	7.06%	3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, SCYB or ESHY?

On fees, SCYB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCYB or ESHY?

SCYB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ESHY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCYB or ESHY?

SCYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.91%, compared with 0.00% for ESHY.

What is the main difference between SCYB and ESHY?

SCYB tracks ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while ESHY tracks JPMorgan ESG DM Corporate High Yield USD Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCYB and 0.20% for ESHY.