SCVL vs. KFRC
SCVL (Shoe Carnival, Inc.) and KFRC (Kforce Inc.) are both stocks. SCVL operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while KFRC operates in Staffing & Employment Services (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, SCVL returned 5.09%/yr vs 11.79%/yr for KFRC. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SCVL vs. KFRC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCVL achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly lower than KFRC's 52.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SCVL has underperformed KFRC with an annualized return of 5.09%, while KFRC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.79% annualized return.
SCVL
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- 2.84%
- 6M
- -6.62%
- 1Y
- -9.60%
- 3Y*
- -4.33%
- 5Y*
- -10.41%
- 10Y*
- 5.09%
KFRC
- 1D
- -3.11%
- 1M
- 7.63%
- YTD
- 52.32%
- 6M
- 58.65%
- 1Y
- 18.12%
- 3Y*
- -5.02%
- 5Y*
- -3.22%
- 10Y*
- 11.79%
SCVL vs. KFRC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCVL Shoe Carnival, Inc. | 2.84% | -47.64% | 11.18% | 28.52% | -38.00% | 101.21% | 6.51% | 12.39% | 26.61% | 0.39% |
KFRC Kforce Inc. | 52.32% | -43.07% | -14.03% | 26.14% | -25.69% | 81.56% | 8.49% | 31.03% | 24.68% | 11.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCVL and KFRC is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 1995 | 0.26 |
The correlation between SCVL and KFRC shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SCVL:
$1.80
KFRC:
$1.95
SCVL:
9.44
KFRC:
23.76
SCVL:
0.58
KFRC:
0.62
SCVL:
$603.54M
KFRC:
$1.33B
SCVL:
$230.65M
KFRC:
$361.86M
SCVL:
$47.52M
KFRC:
$53.65M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCVL vs. KFRC — Risk / Return Rank
SCVL
KFRC
SCVL vs. KFRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shoe Carnival, Inc. (SCVL) and Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCVL | KFRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | 0.27 | -0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.06 | 1.09 | -1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.14 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 0.39 | -0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | 0.61 | -1.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCVL | KFRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 | 0.27 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 | -0.08 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 | 0.30 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.17 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
SCVL vs. KFRC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCVL drawdown since its inception was -84.87%, smaller than the maximum KFRC drawdown of -94.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCVL and KFRC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCVL | KFRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.87% | -94.60% | +9.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.72% | -47.03% | +7.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.17% | -64.72% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.17% | -66.41% | +1.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.53% | -66.41% | -2.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.00% | -34.68% | -26.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.74% | -42.73% | +7.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.03% | 29.77% | -5.74% |
Volatility
SCVL vs. KFRC - Volatility Comparison
Shoe Carnival, Inc. (SCVL) has a higher volatility of 14.43% compared to Kforce Inc. (KFRC) at 12.00%. This indicates that SCVL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KFRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCVL | KFRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.43% | 12.00% | +2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.84% | 47.26% | -15.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.85% | 68.12% | -18.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.73% | 41.55% | +6.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.47% | 39.60% | +13.87% |
Dividends
SCVL vs. KFRC - Dividend Comparison
SCVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than KFRC's 3.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KFRC Kforce Inc. | 3.38% | 5.05% | 2.68% | 2.13% | 2.19% | 1.30% | 1.90% | 1.81% | 1.94% | 1.90% | 2.08% | 1.78% |
SCVL Shoe Carnival, Inc. | 3.64% | 3.47% | 1.59% | 1.36% | 1.42% | 0.65% | 0.89% | 0.89% | 0.93% | 1.08% | 1.00% | 1.08% |
Financials
SCVL vs. KFRC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Shoe Carnival, Inc. and Kforce Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SCVL vs. KFRC - Profitability Comparison
SCVL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shoe Carnival, Inc. reported a gross profit of -88.73M and revenue of -254.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.9%.
KFRC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kforce Inc. reported a gross profit of 90.07M and revenue of 330.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.
SCVL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shoe Carnival, Inc. reported an operating income of -10.94M and revenue of -254.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
KFRC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kforce Inc. reported an operating income of 12.01M and revenue of 330.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.
SCVL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shoe Carnival, Inc. reported a net income of -5.63M and revenue of -254.07M, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
KFRC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kforce Inc. reported a net income of 7.93M and revenue of 330.36M, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SCVL and KFRC have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCVL has higher volatility (14.43%) compared to KFRC (12.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCVL dropped -84.87% vs KFRC's -94.60%.
KFRC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCVL and KFRC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer