PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCVL vs. KFRC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SCVL vs. KFRC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shoe Carnival, Inc. (SCVL) and Kforce Inc. (KFRC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCVL achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly lower than KFRC's 52.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SCVL has underperformed KFRC with an annualized return of 5.09%, while KFRC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.79% annualized return.


SCVL

1D
-2.01%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
2.84%
6M
-6.62%
1Y
-9.60%
3Y*
-4.33%
5Y*
-10.41%
10Y*
5.09%

KFRC

1D
-3.11%
1M
7.63%
YTD
52.32%
6M
58.65%
1Y
18.12%
3Y*
-5.02%
5Y*
-3.22%
10Y*
11.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCVL vs. KFRC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCVL
Shoe Carnival, Inc.
2.84%-47.64%11.18%28.52%-38.00%101.21%6.51%12.39%26.61%0.39%
KFRC
Kforce Inc.
52.32%-43.07%-14.03%26.14%-25.69%81.56%8.49%31.03%24.68%11.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SCVL and KFRC is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 1995

0.26

The correlation between SCVL and KFRC shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

SCVL:

$1.80

KFRC:

$1.95

PE Ratio

SCVL:

9.44

KFRC:

23.76

PS Ratio

SCVL:

0.58

KFRC:

0.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

SCVL:

$603.54M

KFRC:

$1.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SCVL:

$230.65M

KFRC:

$361.86M

EBITDA (TTM)

SCVL:

$47.52M

KFRC:

$53.65M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCVL vs. KFRC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCVL
SCVL Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SCVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCVL Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SCVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCVL Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

KFRC
KFRC Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
KFRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KFRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
KFRC Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
KFRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
KFRC Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCVL vs. KFRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shoe Carnival, Inc. (SCVL) and Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCVLKFRCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.19

0.27

-0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.06

1.09

-1.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.14

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

0.39

-0.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.40

0.61

-1.01

SCVL vs. KFRC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCVL Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the KFRC Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCVL and KFRC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCVLKFRCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

0.27

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

-0.08

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

0.30

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.17

-0.07

Drawdowns

SCVL vs. KFRC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCVL drawdown since its inception was -84.87%, smaller than the maximum KFRC drawdown of -94.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCVL and KFRC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCVLKFRCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.87%

-94.60%

+9.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.72%

-47.03%

+7.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.17%

-64.72%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.17%

-66.41%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.53%

-66.41%

-2.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.00%

-34.68%

-26.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.74%

-42.73%

+7.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.03%

29.77%

-5.74%

Volatility

SCVL vs. KFRC - Volatility Comparison

Shoe Carnival, Inc. (SCVL) has a higher volatility of 14.43% compared to Kforce Inc. (KFRC) at 12.00%. This indicates that SCVL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KFRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCVLKFRCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.43%

12.00%

+2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.84%

47.26%

-15.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.85%

68.12%

-18.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.73%

41.55%

+6.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.47%

39.60%

+13.87%

Dividends

SCVL vs. KFRC - Dividend Comparison

SCVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than KFRC's 3.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KFRC
Kforce Inc.
3.38%5.05%2.68%2.13%2.19%1.30%1.90%1.81%1.94%1.90%2.08%1.78%
SCVL
Shoe Carnival, Inc.
3.64%3.47%1.59%1.36%1.42%0.65%0.89%0.89%0.93%1.08%1.00%1.08%

Financials

SCVL vs. KFRC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Shoe Carnival, Inc. and Kforce Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-200.00M0.00200.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
-254.07M
330.36M
(SCVL) Total Revenue
(KFRC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SCVL vs. KFRC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Shoe Carnival, Inc. and Kforce Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
34.9%
27.3%
Portfolio components
SCVL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shoe Carnival, Inc. reported a gross profit of -88.73M and revenue of -254.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.9%.

KFRC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kforce Inc. reported a gross profit of 90.07M and revenue of 330.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.

SCVL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shoe Carnival, Inc. reported an operating income of -10.94M and revenue of -254.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

KFRC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kforce Inc. reported an operating income of 12.01M and revenue of 330.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.

SCVL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shoe Carnival, Inc. reported a net income of -5.63M and revenue of -254.07M, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.

KFRC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kforce Inc. reported a net income of 7.93M and revenue of 330.36M, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SCVL and KFRC have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCVL has higher volatility (14.43%) compared to KFRC (12.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCVL dropped -84.87% vs KFRC's -94.60%.

KFRC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCVL and KFRC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer