PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCVAX vs. WGCFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCVAX vs. WGCFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX) and Allspring Spectrum Growth Fund (WGCFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCVAX achieves a 16.22% return, which is significantly higher than WGCFX's 11.66% return.


SCVAX

1D
0.40%
1M
0.94%
YTD
16.22%
6M
15.76%
1Y
26.36%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
9.78%

WGCFX

1D
0.27%
1M
4.40%
YTD
11.66%
6M
11.79%
1Y
23.59%
3Y*
15.22%
5Y*
7.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCVAX vs. WGCFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCVAX
Allspring Small Company Value Fund
16.22%1.75%8.22%15.19%-12.13%36.81%1.99%22.20%-14.18%10.99%
WGCFX
Allspring Spectrum Growth Fund
11.66%14.99%10.56%13.82%-17.36%14.27%16.60%20.27%-8.64%18.13%

Correlation

The correlation between SCVAX and WGCFX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.76

The correlation between SCVAX and WGCFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCVAX vs. WGCFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCVAX
SCVAX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SCVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SCVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

WGCFX
WGCFX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
WGCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WGCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
WGCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
WGCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
WGCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCVAX vs. WGCFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX) and Allspring Spectrum Growth Fund (WGCFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCVAXWGCFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.44

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

4.16

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.57

14.24

-3.67

SCVAX vs. WGCFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCVAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the WGCFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCVAX and WGCFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCVAXWGCFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

2.45

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.66

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.81

-0.36

Drawdowns

SCVAX vs. WGCFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCVAX drawdown since its inception was -70.30%, which is greater than WGCFX's maximum drawdown of -22.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCVAX and WGCFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCVAXWGCFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.30%

-22.60%

-47.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.21%

-5.72%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.83%

-9.62%

-17.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.83%

-22.60%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

0.00%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.61%

-4.89%

-5.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

1.67%

+0.99%

Volatility

SCVAX vs. WGCFX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Allspring Spectrum Growth Fund (WGCFX) at 3.42%. This indicates that SCVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WGCFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCVAXWGCFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

3.42%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.56%

7.21%

+4.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.95%

9.73%

+7.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.71%

10.74%

+9.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.23%

11.45%

+11.78%

SCVAX vs. WGCFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCVAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than WGCFX's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCVAX vs. WGCFX - Dividend Comparison

SCVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, less than WGCFX's 7.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCVAX
Allspring Small Company Value Fund
5.06%5.88%8.23%0.77%4.33%6.02%0.39%0.48%0.71%0.30%0.04%0.13%
WGCFX
Allspring Spectrum Growth Fund
7.31%8.17%6.22%0.26%6.87%13.28%11.04%0.60%18.34%13.76%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCVAX and WGCFX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCVAX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to WGCFX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCVAX dropped -70.30% vs WGCFX's -22.60%.

WGCFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCVAX and WGCFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer