SCVAX vs. ERH
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX) and Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund (ERH).
SCVAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jan 31, 2002. ERH is an actively managed fund by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Apr 30, 2004.
Performance
SCVAX vs. ERH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SCVAX vs. ERH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCVAX Allspring Small Company Value Fund | 6.99% | 1.75% | 8.22% | 15.19% | -12.13% | 36.81% | 1.99% | 22.20% | -14.18% | 11.58% |
ERH Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund | 4.55% | 19.85% | 25.71% | -10.52% | -18.38% | 22.14% | -1.15% | 33.97% | -8.98% | 18.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCVAX achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly higher than ERH's 4.55% return. Over the past 10 years, SCVAX has outperformed ERH with an annualized return of 9.37%, while ERH has yielded a comparatively lower 7.07% annualized return.
SCVAX
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- 6.99%
- 6M
- 6.71%
- 1Y
- 16.95%
- 3Y*
- 10.27%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
ERH
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -5.03%
- YTD
- 4.55%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 19.01%
- 3Y*
- 13.22%
- 5Y*
- 6.44%
- 10Y*
- 7.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCVAX vs. ERH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCVAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ERH's 0.93% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SCVAX vs. ERH — Risk / Return Rank
SCVAX
ERH
SCVAX vs. ERH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX) and Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund (ERH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCVAX | ERH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | 1.33 | -0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 1.72 | -0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.27 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 2.04 | -0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.96 | 5.00 | -0.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCVAX | ERH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 1.33 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.38 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.36 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.27 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between SCVAX and ERH is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SCVAX vs. ERH - Dividend Comparison
SCVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, less than ERH's 8.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCVAX Allspring Small Company Value Fund | 5.50% | 5.88% | 8.23% | 0.77% | 4.33% | 6.02% | 0.39% | 0.48% | 0.71% | 0.30% | 0.04% | 0.13% |
ERH Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund | 8.15% | 8.13% | 7.15% | 9.19% | 8.09% | 5.86% | 7.20% | 6.53% | 8.06% | 6.82% | 7.53% | 8.04% |
Drawdowns
SCVAX vs. ERH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCVAX drawdown since its inception was -70.30%, roughly equal to the maximum ERH drawdown of -69.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCVAX and ERH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCVAX | ERH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.30% | -69.81% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.76% | -10.02% | -3.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.83% | -37.85% | +11.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.64% | -46.11% | -0.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.09% | -5.32% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.66% | -17.40% | +6.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 4.09% | -0.48% |
Volatility
SCVAX vs. ERH - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX) has a higher volatility of 5.72% compared to Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund (ERH) at 5.43%. This indicates that SCVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SCVAX | ERH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.72% | 5.43% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.69% | 9.32% | +3.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.61% | 14.68% | +6.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 16.84% | +4.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.24% | 19.64% | +3.60% |