PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCSPX vs. BBNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCSPX vs. BBNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund (SCSPX) and Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund (BBNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCSPX achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than BBNTX's 0.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SCSPX has outperformed BBNTX with an annualized return of 1.91%, while BBNTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.50% annualized return.


SCSPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.42%
1Y
5.59%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
0.88%
10Y*
1.91%

BBNTX

1D
0.20%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.72%
6M
1.05%
1Y
5.00%
3Y*
3.14%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
1.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCSPX vs. BBNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCSPX
Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund
0.42%7.61%2.38%4.51%-9.02%-1.05%4.58%6.24%1.49%3.09%
BBNTX
Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund
0.72%5.19%0.45%3.64%-5.86%-0.23%4.26%6.09%0.73%3.28%

Correlation

The correlation between SCSPX and BBNTX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012

0.54

The correlation between SCSPX and BBNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCSPX vs. BBNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCSPX
SCSPX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
SCSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SCSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

BBNTX
BBNTX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
BBNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BBNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCSPX vs. BBNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund (SCSPX) and Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund (BBNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCSPXBBNTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.55

2.39

-0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.34

3.52

-1.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.63

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

1.79

+0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.97

5.65

+0.32

SCSPX vs. BBNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCSPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the BBNTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCSPX and BBNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCSPXBBNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

2.39

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.27

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.47

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

1.22

-0.60

Drawdowns

SCSPX vs. BBNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCSPX drawdown since its inception was -13.41%, which is greater than BBNTX's maximum drawdown of -10.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCSPX and BBNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCSPXBBNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.41%

-10.25%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-2.81%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.08%

-4.15%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.41%

-10.16%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.41%

-10.25%

-3.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-1.07%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.16%

-1.46%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

0.89%

+0.05%

Volatility

SCSPX vs. BBNTX - Volatility Comparison

Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund (SCSPX) has a higher volatility of 1.32% compared to Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund (BBNTX) at 0.89%. This indicates that SCSPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCSPXBBNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

0.89%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.64%

1.75%

+0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.64%

2.11%

+1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.96%

2.84%

+2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.94%

3.22%

+0.72%

SCSPX vs. BBNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCSPX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than BBNTX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCSPX vs. BBNTX - Dividend Comparison

SCSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than BBNTX's 2.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBNTX
Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund
2.68%3.52%2.82%2.07%1.94%1.59%1.62%2.43%2.51%2.39%2.73%2.98%
SCSPX
Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund
3.91%3.85%3.60%2.57%2.37%2.05%2.50%2.99%3.19%2.74%2.66%2.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCSPX and BBNTX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCSPX has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to BBNTX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCSPX dropped -13.41% vs BBNTX's -10.25%.

BBNTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCSPX and BBNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer