PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCSPX vs. BBNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCSPX vs. BBNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund (SCSPX) and Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund (BBNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCSPX achieves a -0.25% return, which is significantly higher than BBNTX's -0.75% return. Over the past 10 years, SCSPX has outperformed BBNTX with an annualized return of 1.75%, while BBNTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.25% annualized return.


SCSPX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.99%
6M
-0.68%
YTD
-0.25%
1Y
2.60%
3Y*
4.24%
5Y*
0.62%
10Y*
1.75%
ALL TIME*
2.13%

BBNTX

1D
-0.20%
1M
-1.77%
6M
-1.55%
YTD
-0.75%
1Y
2.39%
3Y*
2.47%
5Y*
0.34%
10Y*
1.25%
ALL TIME*
3.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SCSPX vs. BBNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCSPX
Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund
-0.25%7.61%2.38%4.51%-9.02%-1.05%4.58%6.24%1.49%3.09%
BBNTX
Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund
-0.75%5.19%0.45%3.64%-5.86%-0.23%4.26%6.09%0.73%3.28%

Correlation

The correlation between SCSPX and BBNTX is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.54

The correlation between SCSPX and BBNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCSPX vs. BBNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SCSPX
SCSPX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SCSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SCSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

BBNTX
BBNTX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
BBNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
BBNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SCSPX vs. BBNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund (SCSPX) and Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund (BBNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCSPXBBNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.32

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

1.09

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.30

2.87

+0.44

SCSPX vs. BBNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCSPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the BBNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCSPX and BBNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCSPX vs. BBNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCSPX drawdown since its inception was -13.41%, which is greater than BBNTX's maximum drawdown of -10.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCSPX and BBNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCSPXBBNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.41%

-10.25%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-2.81%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.36%

-3.39%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.32%

-10.16%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.41%

-10.25%

-3.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-2.51%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.16%

-1.46%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

1.06%

+0.07%

Volatility

SCSPX vs. BBNTX - Volatility Comparison

Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund (SCSPX) has a higher volatility of 1.02% compared to Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund (BBNTX) at 0.77%. This indicates that SCSPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCSPXBBNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

0.77%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.86%

1.92%

+0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.61%

2.26%

+1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.99%

2.86%

+2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.96%

3.22%

+0.74%

SCSPX vs. BBNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCSPX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than BBNTX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCSPX vs. BBNTX - Dividend Comparison

SCSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than BBNTX's 2.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBNTX
Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund
2.50%3.52%2.82%2.07%1.94%1.59%1.62%2.43%2.51%2.39%2.73%2.98%
SCSPX
Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund
3.63%3.85%3.60%2.57%2.37%2.05%2.50%2.99%3.19%2.74%2.66%2.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCSPX and BBNTX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCSPX has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to BBNTX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCSPX dropped -13.41% vs BBNTX's -10.25%.

BBNTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCSPX and BBNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer