PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCSAX vs. QCGDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCSAX vs. QCGDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Common Stock Fund (SCSAX) and Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SCSAX having a 17.67% return and QCGDX slightly lower at 16.84%.


SCSAX

1D
0.10%
1M
8.06%
YTD
17.67%
6M
15.47%
1Y
22.42%
3Y*
12.23%
5Y*
5.19%
10Y*
11.67%

QCGDX

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.63%
YTD
16.84%
6M
16.10%
1Y
22.20%
3Y*
12.91%
5Y*
9.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCSAX vs. QCGDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SCSAX
Allspring Common Stock Fund
17.67%1.44%6.51%15.90%-17.71%21.14%15.34%0.05%
QCGDX
Quantified Common Ground Fund
16.84%1.02%9.87%14.74%-12.23%32.19%14.65%0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SCSAX and QCGDX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2019

0.77

The correlation between SCSAX and QCGDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCSAX vs. QCGDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCSAX
SCSAX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SCSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
SCSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

QCGDX
QCGDX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QCGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
QCGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCSAX vs. QCGDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Common Stock Fund (SCSAX) and Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCSAXQCGDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.33

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

2.96

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.52

13.27

-6.75

SCSAX vs. QCGDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCSAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the QCGDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCSAX and QCGDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCSAX vs. QCGDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCSAX drawdown since its inception was -53.49%, which is greater than QCGDX's maximum drawdown of -22.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCSAX and QCGDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCSAXQCGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.49%

-22.37%

-31.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.68%

-7.92%

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.64%

-16.10%

-10.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.46%

-20.18%

-18.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.40%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.27%

-6.10%

-4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

1.76%

+1.86%

Volatility

SCSAX vs. QCGDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Common Stock Fund (SCSAX) is 6.37%, while Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX) has a volatility of 7.34%. This indicates that SCSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCGDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCSAXQCGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.37%

7.34%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.55%

11.31%

+3.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.67%

13.58%

+5.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.95%

14.98%

+8.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.05%

16.61%

+7.44%

SCSAX vs. QCGDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCSAX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QCGDX's 1.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCSAX vs. QCGDX - Dividend Comparison

SCSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than QCGDX's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QCGDX
Quantified Common Ground Fund
0.59%0.69%4.42%0.22%0.00%5.44%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCSAX
Allspring Common Stock Fund
3.75%4.42%6.38%3.56%17.66%19.38%4.87%26.88%18.74%11.05%3.82%12.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCSAX and QCGDX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCGDX has higher volatility (7.34%) compared to SCSAX (6.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCSAX dropped -53.49% vs QCGDX's -22.37%.

QCGDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCSAX and QCGDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer