SCSAX vs. LLSCX
SCSAX (Allspring Common Stock Fund) and LLSCX (Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SCSAX returned 10.73%/yr vs 5.81%/yr for LLSCX. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SCSAX charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for LLSCX.
Performance
SCSAX vs. LLSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCSAX achieves a 15.04% return, which is significantly higher than LLSCX's -3.30% return. Over the past 10 years, SCSAX has outperformed LLSCX with an annualized return of 10.73%, while LLSCX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.81% annualized return.
SCSAX
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- 6M
- 11.39%
- YTD
- 15.04%
- 1Y
- 20.98%
- 3Y*
- 8.53%
- 5Y*
- 4.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.02%
LLSCX
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- 6M
- -4.81%
- YTD
- -3.30%
- 1Y
- 1.06%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.00%
- 10Y*
- 5.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.87%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
SCSAX vs. LLSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCSAX Allspring Common Stock Fund | 15.04% | 1.44% | 6.51% | 15.90% | -17.71% | 21.14% | 15.34% | 47.23% | -10.02% | 17.54% |
LLSCX Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund | -3.30% | 7.56% | 9.69% | 20.17% | -19.25% | 11.18% | 4.17% | 27.74% | -6.52% | 9.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCSAX and LLSCX is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SCSAX and LLSCX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCSAX vs. LLSCX — Risk / Return Rank
SCSAX
LLSCX
SCSAX vs. LLSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Common Stock Fund (SCSAX) and Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCSAX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.99 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | -0.15 | +1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.67 | -0.31 | +4.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCSAX vs. LLSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCSAX drawdown since its inception was -53.49%, smaller than the maximum LLSCX drawdown of -63.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCSAX and LLSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCSAX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.49% | -63.97% | +10.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.68% | -11.44% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.64% | -15.40% | -11.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.46% | -26.67% | -11.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.63% | -42.23% | -3.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.87% | -7.56% | +4.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.24% | -8.90% | -1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 5.62% | -2.01% |
Volatility
SCSAX vs. LLSCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Allspring Common Stock Fund (SCSAX) is 4.06%, while Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that SCSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LLSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCSAX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 5.13% | -1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.56% | 10.29% | +4.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.85% | 13.38% | +5.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.95% | 17.03% | +6.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.95% | 24.58% | -0.63% |
SCSAX vs. LLSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCSAX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LLSCX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCSAX vs. LLSCX - Dividend Comparison
SCSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than LLSCX's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LLSCX Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund | 1.21% | 1.17% | 0.11% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 0.82% | 5.85% | 14.89% | 18.13% | 8.43% | 18.01% | 5.91% |
SCSAX Allspring Common Stock Fund | 3.84% | 4.42% | 6.38% | 3.56% | 17.66% | 19.38% | 4.87% | 26.88% | 18.74% | 11.05% | 3.82% | 12.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCSAX and LLSCX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LLSCX has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to SCSAX (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCSAX dropped -53.49% vs LLSCX's -63.97%.
SCSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCSAX and LLSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer