SCSAX vs. FZAMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCSAX (Allspring Common Stock Fund) and FZAMX (Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SCSAX returned 10.73%/yr vs 12.38%/yr for FZAMX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCSAX charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FZAMX.

Performance

SCSAX vs. FZAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Common Stock Fund (SCSAX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCSAX achieves a 13.01% return, which is significantly lower than FZAMX's 21.57% return. Over the past 10 years, SCSAX has underperformed FZAMX with an annualized return of 10.73%, while FZAMX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.38% annualized return.

SCSAX

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 5.87%
• YTD: 13.01%
• 6M: 12.17%
• 1Y: 19.86%
• 3Y*: 10.98%
• 5Y*: 4.51%
• 10Y*: 10.73%

FZAMX

• 1D: 1.43%
• 1M: 4.09%
• YTD: 21.57%
• 6M: 22.92%
• 1Y: 38.64%
• 3Y*: 21.20%
• 5Y*: 11.20%
• 10Y*: 12.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCSAX vs. FZAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCSAX Allspring Common Stock Fund	13.01%	1.44%	6.51%	15.90%	-17.71%	21.14%	15.34%	47.23%	-10.02%	17.54%
FZAMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z	21.57%	12.00%	17.39%	15.15%	-14.70%	25.40%	18.84%	23.85%	-14.85%	20.78%

Correlation

The correlation between SCSAX and FZAMX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2013	0.95

The correlation between SCSAX and FZAMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SCSAX vs. FZAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCSAX

SCSAX Risk / Return Rank: 19
SCSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
SCSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
SCSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
SCSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
SCSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

FZAMX

FZAMX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FZAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FZAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FZAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
FZAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FZAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCSAX vs. FZAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Common Stock Fund (SCSAX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCSAX	FZAMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	2.35	-1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	3.19	-1.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.41	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	4.12	-2.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.91	16.56	-10.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCSAX vs. FZAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCSAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the FZAMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCSAX and FZAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCSAX	FZAMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19	2.35	-1.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	0.56	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	0.59	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.57	-0.18

Drawdowns

SCSAX vs. FZAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCSAX drawdown since its inception was -53.49%, which is greater than FZAMX's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCSAX and FZAMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCSAX	FZAMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.49%	-42.32%	-11.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.68%	-9.77%	-2.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.64%	-25.24%	-1.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.46%	-25.24%	-13.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.63%	-42.32%	-3.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.26%	0.00%	-2.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.29%	-6.08%	-4.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.61%	2.43%	+1.18%

Volatility

SCSAX vs. FZAMX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Common Stock Fund (SCSAX) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) at 5.00%. This indicates that SCSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCSAX	FZAMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.86%	5.00%	+0.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.78%	13.74%	+0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.96%	17.14%	+0.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.84%	20.23%	+3.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.00%	20.94%	+3.06%

SCSAX vs. FZAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCSAX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FZAMX's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCSAX vs. FZAMX - Dividend Comparison

SCSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than FZAMX's 5.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FZAMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z	5.80%	10.09%	6.93%	2.83%	5.86%	18.58%	1.41%	3.50%	10.72%	7.81%	5.00%	4.90%
SCSAX Allspring Common Stock Fund	3.91%	4.42%	6.38%	3.56%	17.66%	19.38%	4.87%	26.88%	18.74%	11.05%	3.82%	12.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCSAX and FZAMX in my portfolio?

SCSAX and FZAMX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCSAX or FZAMX?

SCSAX has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to FZAMX (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCSAX dropped -53.49% vs FZAMX's -42.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FZAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.