PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCRD vs. USIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCRD vs. USIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (SCRD) and iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCRD achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than USIG's 0.56% return.


SCRD

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.24%
6M
0.13%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
5.54%
5Y*
10Y*

USIG

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.56%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.37%
1Y
6.04%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
0.72%
10Y*
2.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCRD vs. USIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SCRD
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF
0.24%7.77%3.21%8.76%-15.99%-1.25%
USIG
iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.56%7.86%2.56%8.71%-15.30%-1.47%

Correlation

The correlation between SCRD and USIG is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2021

0.95

The correlation between SCRD and USIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCRD vs. USIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCRD
SCRD Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SCRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCRD Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SCRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCRD Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

USIG
USIG Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
USIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
USIG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
USIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
USIG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCRD vs. USIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (SCRD) and iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCRDUSIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.26

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

2.17

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.63

7.07

+0.56

SCRD vs. USIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCRD Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the USIG Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCRD and USIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCRDUSIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

1.47

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.54

-0.52

Drawdowns

SCRD vs. USIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCRD drawdown since its inception was -21.17%, roughly equal to the maximum USIG drawdown of -22.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCRD and USIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCRDUSIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.17%

-22.21%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-2.79%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.84%

-6.10%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-0.97%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.77%

-3.42%

-5.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

0.86%

-0.04%

Volatility

SCRD vs. USIG - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (SCRD) and iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG) have volatilities of 1.25% and 1.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCRDUSIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

1.27%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

3.04%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88%

4.13%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.32%

6.82%

-0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.32%

6.82%

-0.50%

SCRD vs. USIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCRD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than USIG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCRD vs. USIG - Dividend Comparison

SCRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, more than USIG's 4.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCRD
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF
5.44%5.28%5.36%3.99%2.77%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USIG
iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.74%4.62%4.51%3.94%3.14%2.33%2.82%3.37%3.44%3.03%2.87%3.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SCRD and USIG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

USIG has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to SCRD (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCRD dropped -21.17% vs USIG's -22.21%.

On 3-year performance, SCRD leads with 5.54% vs 5.46% for USIG. On fees, USIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SCRD has performed better with a 5.54% return vs 5.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SCRD.

SCRD has the higher dividend yield at 5.44%, compared with 4.74% for USIG.

They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SCRD and 0.04% for USIG.

SCRD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCRD and USIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer