PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCRD vs. COMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCRD vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (SCRD) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCRD achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.


SCRD

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.24%
6M
0.13%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
5.54%
5Y*
10Y*

COMT

1D
0.78%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
39.67%
6M
39.06%
1Y
47.51%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
9.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCRD vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SCRD
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF
0.24%7.77%3.21%8.76%-15.99%-1.25%
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
39.67%6.07%5.96%-6.56%19.45%6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SCRD and COMT is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2021

-0.10

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SCRD and COMT has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.10 to -0.37, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

SCRD vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCRD
COMT

Financial Services

25.0%
100.0%

Healthcare

12.5%

-

Industrials

8.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.9%

-

Real Estate

5.8%

-

Technology

4.5%

-

Communication Services

2.4%

-

Energy

2.3%

-

Basic Materials

2.2%

-

Utilities

1.9%

-

Financial Services

SCRD
25.0%
COMT
100.0%

Healthcare

SCRD
12.5%
COMT

-

Industrials

SCRD
8.2%
COMT

-

Consumer Defensive

SCRD
6.6%
COMT

-

Consumer Cyclical

SCRD
5.9%
COMT

-

Real Estate

SCRD
5.8%
COMT

-

Technology

SCRD
4.5%
COMT

-

Communication Services

SCRD
2.4%
COMT

-

Energy

SCRD
2.3%
COMT

-

Basic Materials

SCRD
2.2%
COMT

-

Utilities

SCRD
1.9%
COMT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCRD vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCRD
SCRD Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SCRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCRD Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SCRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCRD Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

COMT
COMT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCRD vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (SCRD) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCRDCOMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.40

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

5.95

-3.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.63

14.11

-6.48

SCRD vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCRD Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCRD and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCRDCOMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

2.24

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.20

-0.18

Drawdowns

SCRD vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCRD drawdown since its inception was -21.17%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCRD and COMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCRDCOMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.17%

-51.89%

+30.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-8.02%

+5.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.84%

-13.31%

+6.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-4.82%

+3.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.77%

-24.07%

+15.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

3.38%

-2.56%

Volatility

SCRD vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (SCRD) is 1.25%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that SCRD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCRDCOMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

7.37%

-6.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

18.80%

-16.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88%

21.29%

-17.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.32%

21.06%

-14.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.32%

18.89%

-12.57%

SCRD vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCRD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCRD vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

SCRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, less than COMT's 5.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
5.54%7.74%4.90%5.19%29.79%17.79%0.36%2.61%11.65%5.16%0.52%1.44%
SCRD
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF
5.44%5.28%5.36%3.99%2.77%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCRD and COMT have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to SCRD (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCRD dropped -21.17% vs COMT's -51.89%.

On 3-year performance, COMT leads with 16.86% vs 5.54% for SCRD. On fees, SCRD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SCRD has been the lower-risk option at 1.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, COMT has performed better with a 16.86% return vs 5.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCRD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 5.44% for SCRD.

SCRD is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SCRD and 0.48% for COMT.

COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCRD and COMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer