PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCPZX vs. SUBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCPZX vs. SUBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund (SCPZX) and Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund (SUBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SCPZX having a 0.81% return and SUBFX slightly lower at 0.79%. Over the past 10 years, SCPZX has underperformed SUBFX with an annualized return of 2.87%, while SUBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.93% annualized return.


SCPZX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
0.81%
6M
0.68%
1Y
6.45%
3Y*
4.51%
5Y*
0.88%
10Y*
2.87%

SUBFX

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
0.79%
6M
0.69%
1Y
6.13%
3Y*
6.44%
5Y*
3.55%
10Y*
3.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCPZX vs. SUBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCPZX
Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund
0.81%8.68%1.34%6.27%-11.79%-1.96%16.56%8.30%0.76%3.51%
SUBFX
Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund
0.79%10.61%4.22%8.53%-4.74%-0.32%11.18%6.52%0.53%2.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SCPZX and SUBFX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2011

0.64

Over the past year, SCPZX and SUBFX have become more correlated (0.93) than their long-term average of 0.64, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCPZX vs. SUBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCPZX
SCPZX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
SCPZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCPZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCPZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SCPZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCPZX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

SUBFX
SUBFX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SUBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SUBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCPZX vs. SUBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund (SCPZX) and Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund (SUBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCPZXSUBFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.49

1.74

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

2.60

-0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.34

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

2.64

-0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.37

10.26

-2.89

SCPZX vs. SUBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCPZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the SUBFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCPZX and SUBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCPZXSUBFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

1.74

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.65

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.75

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.95

-0.60

Drawdowns

SCPZX vs. SUBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCPZX drawdown since its inception was -28.85%, which is greater than SUBFX's maximum drawdown of -11.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCPZX and SUBFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCPZXSUBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.85%

-11.22%

-17.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-2.34%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.72%

-4.88%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.39%

-11.17%

-6.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.38%

-11.22%

-7.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-1.04%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.75%

-1.46%

-2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

0.60%

+0.26%

Volatility

SCPZX vs. SUBFX - Volatility Comparison

Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund (SCPZX) and Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund (SUBFX) have volatilities of 1.57% and 1.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCPZXSUBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.57%

1.51%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.03%

2.78%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.12%

3.43%

+0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.56%

5.49%

+1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.60%

5.29%

+0.31%

SCPZX vs. SUBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCPZX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SUBFX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCPZX vs. SUBFX - Dividend Comparison

SCPZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than SUBFX's 6.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCPZX
Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund
4.24%4.35%4.70%4.31%3.06%1.27%5.79%4.47%2.26%1.76%3.92%2.89%
SUBFX
Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund
6.06%6.44%4.92%4.52%2.16%1.96%3.01%2.83%2.06%1.17%1.01%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SCPZX and SUBFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCPZX has higher volatility (1.57%) compared to SUBFX (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCPZX dropped -28.85% vs SUBFX's -11.22%.

SUBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCPZX and SUBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer