SCORX vs. PRPFX
SCORX (Sextant Core Fund) and PRPFX (Permanent Portfolio Class I) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, SCORX returned 8.15%/yr vs 10.52%/yr for PRPFX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCORX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for PRPFX.
Performance
SCORX vs. PRPFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCORX achieves a 7.88% return, which is significantly higher than PRPFX's 3.39% return. Over the past 10 years, SCORX has underperformed PRPFX with an annualized return of 8.15%, while PRPFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.52% annualized return.
SCORX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 7.88%
- 6M
- 7.94%
- 1Y
- 18.62%
- 3Y*
- 12.21%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.15%
PRPFX
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 3.39%
- 6M
- 2.62%
- 1Y
- 18.88%
- 3Y*
- 19.46%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.52%
SCORX vs. PRPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCORX Sextant Core Fund | 7.88% | 14.20% | 9.80% | 9.85% | -10.39% | 12.12% | 10.37% | 20.01% | -4.61% | 14.58% |
PRPFX Permanent Portfolio Class I | 3.39% | 28.78% | 19.36% | 11.96% | -5.48% | 10.87% | 18.80% | 19.20% | -7.02% | 11.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCORX and PRPFX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008 | 0.72 |
The correlation between SCORX and PRPFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCORX vs. PRPFX — Risk / Return Rank
SCORX
PRPFX
SCORX vs. PRPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sextant Core Fund (SCORX) and Permanent Portfolio Class I (PRPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCORX | PRPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.29 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 2.19 | +0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.08 | 5.66 | +4.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCORX vs. PRPFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCORX drawdown since its inception was -32.34%, which is greater than PRPFX's maximum drawdown of -27.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCORX and PRPFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCORX | PRPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.34% | -27.16% | -5.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.62% | -8.40% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.95% | -8.40% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.05% | -15.49% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.10% | -20.84% | -0.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -7.50% | +6.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.28% | -3.52% | -0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 3.24% | -1.43% |
Volatility
SCORX vs. PRPFX - Volatility Comparison
Sextant Core Fund (SCORX) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to Permanent Portfolio Class I (PRPFX) at 3.73%. This indicates that SCORX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCORX | PRPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 3.73% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.21% | 11.63% | -3.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.61% | 12.90% | -3.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.41% | 11.10% | -1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.84% | 10.66% | -0.82% |
SCORX vs. PRPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCORX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PRPFX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCORX vs. PRPFX - Dividend Comparison
SCORX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than PRPFX's 3.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRPFX Permanent Portfolio Class I | 3.16% | 3.27% | 1.86% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 2.05% | 5.38% | 4.69% | 6.90% | 2.14% | 0.95% | 7.06% |
SCORX Sextant Core Fund | 1.99% | 2.14% | 2.78% | 1.61% | 1.51% | 3.13% | 1.42% | 5.99% | 1.43% | 1.36% | 1.48% | 4.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCORX and PRPFX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCORX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to PRPFX (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCORX dropped -32.34% vs PRPFX's -27.16%.
SCORX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCORX and PRPFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer