PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCMIX vs. FELCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCMIX vs. FELCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 2 Class (SCMIX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C (FELCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCMIX achieves a 58.84% return, which is significantly lower than FELCX's 84.21% return. Over the past 10 years, SCMIX has underperformed FELCX with an annualized return of 28.38%, while FELCX has yielded a comparatively higher 36.19% annualized return.


SCMIX

1D
3.67%
1M
15.59%
YTD
58.84%
6M
55.57%
1Y
126.94%
3Y*
48.05%
5Y*
27.17%
10Y*
28.38%

FELCX

1D
6.40%
1M
26.11%
YTD
84.21%
6M
81.97%
1Y
167.52%
3Y*
62.30%
5Y*
42.49%
10Y*
36.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCMIX vs. FELCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCMIX
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 2 Class
58.84%37.73%27.06%44.68%-30.96%39.37%44.85%54.60%-7.81%34.46%
FELCX
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C
84.21%43.80%42.66%73.83%-35.56%56.29%42.50%62.54%-13.48%33.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SCMIX and FELCX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2002

0.90

The correlation between SCMIX and FELCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCMIX vs. FELCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCMIX
SCMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SCMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SCMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

FELCX
FELCX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FELCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FELCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FELCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FELCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FELCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCMIX vs. FELCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 2 Class (SCMIX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C (FELCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCMIXFELCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.72

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.71

11.99

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

41.57

46.62

-5.05

SCMIX vs. FELCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCMIX Sharpe Ratio is 5.06, which is comparable to the FELCX Sharpe Ratio of 5.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCMIX and FELCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCMIXFELCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.06

5.43

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

1.11

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.09

1.05

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.45

+0.24

Drawdowns

SCMIX vs. FELCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCMIX drawdown since its inception was -50.85%, smaller than the maximum FELCX drawdown of -72.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCMIX and FELCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCMIXFELCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.85%

-72.55%

+21.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.32%

-14.71%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.08%

-36.53%

+7.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.18%

-46.47%

+9.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.18%

-46.47%

+9.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.41%

-23.57%

+14.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

3.78%

-0.61%

Volatility

SCMIX vs. FELCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 2 Class (SCMIX) is 7.25%, while Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C (FELCX) has a volatility of 11.91%. This indicates that SCMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FELCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCMIXFELCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.25%

11.91%

-4.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.07%

25.31%

-5.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.09%

32.52%

-6.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.21%

38.34%

-12.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.14%

34.70%

-8.56%

SCMIX vs. FELCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCMIX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than FELCX's 1.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCMIX vs. FELCX - Dividend Comparison

SCMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than FELCX's 4.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FELCX
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C
4.53%8.35%8.97%4.24%4.07%4.95%5.13%0.93%22.41%10.39%0.14%11.27%
SCMIX
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 2 Class
4.99%7.93%12.11%4.52%8.08%10.45%9.38%10.47%11.30%10.48%7.88%10.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCMIX and FELCX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FELCX has higher volatility (11.91%) compared to SCMIX (7.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCMIX dropped -50.85% vs FELCX's -72.55%.

FELCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.43 vs 5.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCMIX and FELCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer