SCMIX vs. QQQ

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SCMIX (Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 2 Class) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both funds - SCMIX is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Columbia, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. SCMIX is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCMIX returned 26.64%/yr vs 20.44%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SCMIX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.

Performance

SCMIX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 2 Class (SCMIX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCMIX achieves a 45.86% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 12.26% return. Over the past 10 years, SCMIX has outperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 26.64%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively lower 20.44% annualized return.

SCMIX

• 1D: 4.87%
• 1M: -3.55%
• 6M: 32.98%
• YTD: 45.86%
• 1Y: 85.10%
• 3Y*: 39.53%
• 5Y*: 23.75%
• 10Y*: 26.64%
• ALL TIME*: 15.79%

QQQ

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -3.45%
• 6M: 10.89%
• YTD: 12.26%
• 1Y: 24.81%
• 3Y*: 22.29%
• 5Y*: 14.23%
• 10Y*: 20.44%
• ALL TIME*: 10.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	$30.32B	$28.40B	$31.45B
SCMIX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 2 Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SCMIX vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCMIX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 2 Class	45.86%	37.73%	27.06%	44.68%	-30.96%	39.37%	44.85%	54.60%	-7.81%	34.46%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	12.26%	20.77%	25.58%	54.86%	-32.58%	27.42%	48.62%	38.96%	-0.13%	32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SCMIX and QQQ is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2002	0.89

The correlation between SCMIX and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SCMIX vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SCMIX

SCMIX Risk / Return Rank: 93
SCMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
SCMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
SCMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
SCMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
SCMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

QQQ

QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 49
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 45
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SCMIX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 2 Class (SCMIX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCMIX	QQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.76	1.16	+1.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	1.65	+1.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.21	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.39	1.88	+4.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.01	6.00	+15.01

SCMIX vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is higher than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCMIX and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCMIX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCMIX drawdown since its inception was -50.85%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCMIX and QQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCMIX	QQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.85%	-82.97%	+32.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.76%	-11.96%	-0.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.08%	-22.77%	-6.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.18%	-35.12%	-2.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.18%	-35.12%	-2.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.51%	-7.69%	-0.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.38%	-32.62%	+23.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.85%	3.74%	+0.11%

Volatility

SCMIX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 2 Class (SCMIX) has a higher volatility of 10.03% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.87%. This indicates that SCMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCMIX	QQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.03%	6.87%	+3.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.32%	16.08%	+7.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.59%	19.38%	+10.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.92%	22.90%	+4.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.38%	22.50%	+3.88%

SCMIX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCMIX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCMIX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

SCMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, more than QQQ's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	0.44%	0.45%	0.56%	0.62%	0.80%	0.43%	0.55%	0.74%	0.91%	0.84%	1.06%	0.99%
SCMIX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 2 Class	5.44%	7.93%	12.11%	4.52%	8.08%	10.45%	9.38%	10.47%	11.30%	10.48%	7.88%	10.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCMIX and QQQ in my portfolio?

SCMIX and QQQ have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCMIX or QQQ?

SCMIX has higher volatility (10.03%) compared to QQQ (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCMIX dropped -50.85% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.