SCMC vs. TMB
SCMC (Sterling Capital Multi-Strategy Income ETF) and TMB (Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.55% expense ratio.
Performance
SCMC vs. TMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCMC
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMB
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCMC vs. TMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCMC Sterling Capital Multi-Strategy Income ETF | 0.16% |
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | 0.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCMC and TMB is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCMC vs. TMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Multi-Strategy Income ETF (SCMC) and Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCMC | TMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 5.77 | -4.45 |
Drawdowns
SCMC vs. TMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCMC drawdown since its inception was -1.91%, which is greater than TMB's maximum drawdown of -0.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCMC and TMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCMC | TMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.91% | -0.24% | -1.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.06% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.36% | -0.06% | -0.30% |
Volatility
SCMC vs. TMB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCMC | TMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.83% | 2.46% | +0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.83% | 2.46% | +0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.83% | 2.46% | +0.37% |
SCMC vs. TMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCMC and TMB have an expense ratio of 0.55%.
Dividends
SCMC vs. TMB - Dividend Comparison
SCMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than TMB's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
SCMC Sterling Capital Multi-Strategy Income ETF | 2.17% | 0.29% |
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | 0.36% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCMC and TMB have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCMC and TMB have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.
SCMC has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 0.36% for TMB.
They also come from different issuers: Sterling Capital and Thornburg.
Find the right allocation for SCMC and TMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer