SCMBX vs. WFSPX
SCMBX (DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund) and WFSPX (iShares S&P 500 Index Fund) are both mutual funds - SCMBX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by BlackRock, while WFSPX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, SCMBX returned 1.82%/yr vs 15.54%/yr for WFSPX. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCMBX charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for WFSPX.
Performance
SCMBX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCMBX achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than WFSPX's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, SCMBX has underperformed WFSPX with an annualized return of 1.82%, while WFSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.54% annualized return.
SCMBX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 7.06%
- 3Y*
- 3.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.13%
- 10Y*
- 1.82%
WFSPX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 5.80%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 6M
- 11.72%
- 1Y
- 28.93%
- 3Y*
- 22.71%
- 5Y*
- 14.24%
- 10Y*
- 15.54%
SCMBX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCMBX DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund | 1.64% | 3.21% | 2.52% | 6.64% | -12.83% | 2.09% | 4.72% | 8.93% | 0.21% | 5.58% |
WFSPX iShares S&P 500 Index Fund | 11.69% | 17.83% | 24.94% | 26.25% | -18.14% | 28.63% | 18.43% | 31.45% | -4.83% | 21.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCMBX and WFSPX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 1993 | 0.01 |
Over the past year, SCMBX and WFSPX have become more correlated (0.21) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCMBX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank
SCMBX
WFSPX
SCMBX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund (SCMBX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCMBX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.46 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 3.35 | -0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.99 | 15.65 | -7.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCMBX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | 2.52 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.85 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.87 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.27 | 0.13 | +1.14 |
Drawdowns
SCMBX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCMBX drawdown since its inception was -18.17%, smaller than the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCMBX and WFSPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCMBX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.17% | -58.21% | +40.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.96% | -8.90% | +5.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.02% | -18.74% | +11.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.17% | -24.51% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.17% | -33.74% | +15.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | 0.00% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -12.77% | +10.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | 1.90% | -1.01% |
Volatility
SCMBX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund (SCMBX) is 1.22%, while iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that SCMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCMBX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 2.82% | -1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.31% | 8.97% | -6.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.02% | 11.85% | -8.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.41% | 16.88% | -12.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.32% | 18.02% | -13.70% |
SCMBX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCMBX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCMBX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison
SCMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than WFSPX's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCMBX DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund | 3.74% | 4.46% | 3.49% | 2.64% | 2.36% | 3.27% | 3.57% | 4.32% | 3.42% | 3.31% | 3.87% | 3.99% |
WFSPX iShares S&P 500 Index Fund | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.41% | 1.50% | 2.02% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 1.99% | 2.00% | 1.62% | 2.37% | 2.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCMBX and WFSPX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WFSPX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to SCMBX (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCMBX dropped -18.17% vs WFSPX's -58.21%.
WFSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCMBX and WFSPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer