PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCMBX vs. FFRAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCMBX vs. FFRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund (SCMBX) and Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A (FFRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCMBX achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than FFRAX's 1.82% return. Over the past 10 years, SCMBX has underperformed FFRAX with an annualized return of 1.82%, while FFRAX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.57% annualized return.


SCMBX

1D
0.25%
1M
0.95%
YTD
1.64%
6M
1.88%
1Y
7.06%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
0.13%
10Y*
1.82%

FFRAX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.75%
YTD
1.82%
6M
2.43%
1Y
5.82%
3Y*
7.04%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*
4.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCMBX vs. FFRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCMBX
DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund
1.64%3.21%2.52%6.64%-12.83%2.09%4.72%8.93%0.21%5.58%
FFRAX
Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A
1.82%5.28%6.83%11.35%-1.77%4.83%1.38%8.19%-0.09%3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SCMBX and FFRAX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2000

0.06

The correlation between SCMBX and FFRAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCMBX vs. FFRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCMBX
SCMBX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SCMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SCMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

FFRAX
FFRAX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FFRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FFRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCMBX vs. FFRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund (SCMBX) and Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A (FFRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCMBXFFRAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.85

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

4.82

-2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.99

17.31

-9.31

SCMBX vs. FFRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCMBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the FFRAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCMBX and FFRAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCMBXFFRAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

2.45

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

1.75

-1.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

1.11

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

1.17

+0.10

Drawdowns

SCMBX vs. FFRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCMBX drawdown since its inception was -18.17%, smaller than the maximum FFRAX drawdown of -22.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCMBX and FFRAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCMBXFFRAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.17%

-22.21%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.96%

-1.21%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.02%

-3.31%

-3.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.17%

-6.02%

-12.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.17%

-22.21%

+4.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-0.11%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.23%

-1.03%

-1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

0.34%

+0.55%

Volatility

SCMBX vs. FFRAX - Volatility Comparison

DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund (SCMBX) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A (FFRAX) at 0.59%. This indicates that SCMBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCMBXFFRAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

0.59%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.31%

1.72%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02%

2.38%

+0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.41%

2.88%

+1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.32%

4.13%

+0.19%

SCMBX vs. FFRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCMBX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than FFRAX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCMBX vs. FFRAX - Dividend Comparison

SCMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than FFRAX's 6.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFRAX
Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A
6.78%7.12%6.69%7.24%3.57%2.47%3.56%4.86%4.42%3.77%4.14%3.42%
SCMBX
DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund
3.74%4.46%3.49%2.64%2.36%3.27%3.57%4.32%3.42%3.31%3.87%3.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCMBX and FFRAX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCMBX has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to FFRAX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCMBX dropped -18.17% vs FFRAX's -22.21%.

FFRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCMBX and FFRAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer