SCMB vs. WT
SCMB (Schwab Municipal Bond ETF) is Municipal Bonds fund tracking the ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while WT (WisdomTree Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, SCMB returned 3.13%/yr vs 40.76%/yr for WT. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SCMB vs. WT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCMB achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly lower than WT's 50.89% return.
SCMB
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 1.58%
- 1Y
- 6.25%
- 3Y*
- 3.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WT
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- -3.93%
- YTD
- 50.89%
- 6M
- 45.75%
- 1Y
- 77.53%
- 3Y*
- 40.76%
- 5Y*
- 25.92%
- 10Y*
- 8.49%
SCMB vs. WT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | 1.39% | 3.78% | 0.91% | 5.86% | 2.88% |
WT WisdomTree Inc. | 50.89% | 17.38% | 53.55% | 29.56% | 17.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCMB and WT is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCMB vs. WT — Risk / Return Rank
SCMB
WT
SCMB vs. WT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) and WisdomTree Inc. (WT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCMB | WT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.32 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 2.92 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.06 | 6.91 | +0.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCMB vs. WT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCMB drawdown since its inception was -6.13%, smaller than the maximum WT drawdown of -99.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCMB and WT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCMB | WT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.13% | -99.92% | +93.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.92% | -26.67% | +23.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.57% | -36.94% | +31.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -83.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -10.74% | +10.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.31% | -60.13% | +58.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | 11.26% | -10.37% |
Volatility
SCMB vs. WT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) is 0.76%, while WisdomTree Inc. (WT) has a volatility of 10.79%. This indicates that SCMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCMB | WT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.76% | 10.79% | -10.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.17% | 31.18% | -29.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89% | 37.31% | -34.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 32.24% | -28.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 42.84% | -38.70% |
Dividends
SCMB vs. WT - Dividend Comparison
SCMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than WT's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | 3.52% | 3.36% | 3.34% | 3.10% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WT WisdomTree Inc. | 0.65% | 0.98% | 1.14% | 1.73% | 2.20% | 1.96% | 2.24% | 2.48% | 1.80% | 2.55% | 2.87% | 3.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCMB and WT have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WT has higher volatility (10.79%) compared to SCMB (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCMB dropped -6.13% vs WT's -99.92%.
SCMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCMB and WT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer