WT vs. BOTZ
WT (WisdomTree Inc.) is a stock, while BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) is Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Over the past 5 years, WT returned 21.78%/yr vs 1.93%/yr for BOTZ. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WT vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WT achieves a 40.76% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 3.84% return.
WT
- 1D
- -2.79%
- 1M
- -10.33%
- YTD
- 40.76%
- 6M
- 45.29%
- 1Y
- 72.06%
- 3Y*
- 35.33%
- 5Y*
- 21.78%
- 10Y*
- 7.24%
BOTZ
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- -9.24%
- YTD
- 3.84%
- 6M
- 2.45%
- 1Y
- 20.62%
- 3Y*
- 10.28%
- 5Y*
- 1.93%
- 10Y*
- —
WT vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WT WisdomTree Inc. | 40.76% | 17.38% | 53.55% | 29.56% | -8.94% | 16.57% | 14.13% | -25.75% | -46.31% | 16.47% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 3.84% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -42.69% | 8.65% | 51.92% | 31.80% | -28.34% | 58.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between WT and BOTZ is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WT vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
WT
BOTZ
WT vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Inc. (WT) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WT | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.16 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 1.07 | +1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.50 | 3.62 | +2.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WT | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 0.84 | +1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.07 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.41 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
WT vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WT drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than BOTZ's maximum drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WT and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WT | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -55.54% | -44.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.67% | -19.34% | -7.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.94% | -29.02% | -7.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.94% | -55.54% | +18.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.73% | -9.63% | -7.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.18% | -18.30% | -41.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.12% | 5.71% | +5.41% |
Volatility
WT vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Inc. (WT) has a higher volatility of 11.10% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 8.09%. This indicates that WT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WT | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.10% | 8.09% | +3.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.77% | 18.92% | +11.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.15% | 24.64% | +12.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.32% | 26.84% | +5.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.92% | 25.77% | +17.15% |
Dividends
WT vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
WT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than BOTZ's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.63% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
WT WisdomTree Inc. | 0.70% | 0.98% | 1.14% | 1.73% | 2.20% | 1.96% | 2.24% | 2.48% | 1.80% | 2.55% | 2.87% | 3.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WT and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WT has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to BOTZ (8.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WT dropped -99.92% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.
WT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WT and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer