SCMB vs. JMUB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCMB (Schwab Municipal Bond ETF) and JMUB (JPMorgan Municipal ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. SCMB is passively managed, while JMUB is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SCMB returned 3.37%/yr vs 3.91%/yr for JMUB. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCMB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for JMUB.

Performance

SCMB vs. JMUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) and JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCMB achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly lower than JMUB's 1.26% return.

SCMB

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 1.07%
• 6M: 1.55%
• 1Y: 6.86%
• 3Y*: 3.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JMUB

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.56%
• YTD: 1.26%
• 6M: 1.53%
• 1Y: 6.12%
• 3Y*: 3.91%
• 5Y*: 1.23%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCMB vs. JMUB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	1.07%	3.78%	0.91%	5.86%	3.05%
JMUB JPMorgan Municipal ETF	1.26%	4.34%	1.88%	5.96%	2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SCMB and JMUB is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2022	0.87

The correlation between SCMB and JMUB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCMB vs. JMUB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCMB	JMUB
Financial Services	8.9%	2.2%
Real Estate	3.4%	0.9%
Consumer Cyclical	2.6%	0.6%
Technology	0.9%	1.0%
Communication Services	0.5%	8.6%
Utilities	0.2%	2.2%
Industrials	0.2%	0.2%
Consumer Defensive	0.1%	0.3%
Healthcare	0.1%	0.1%
Basic Materials	0.0%	0.4%
Energy	0.0%	0.0%

Return for Risk

SCMB vs. JMUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCMB

SCMB Risk / Return Rank: 64
SCMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
SCMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
SCMB Omega Ratio Rank: 81
SCMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
SCMB Martin Ratio Rank: 47

JMUB

JMUB Risk / Return Rank: 69
JMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
JMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
JMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 89
JMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
JMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCMB vs. JMUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) and JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCMB	JMUB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	2.56	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.45	3.67	-0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.57	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	2.40	-0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.89	8.37	-0.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCMB vs. JMUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCMB Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the JMUB Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCMB and JMUB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCMB	JMUB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34	2.56	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.97	0.74	+0.24

Drawdowns

SCMB vs. JMUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCMB drawdown since its inception was -6.13%, smaller than the maximum JMUB drawdown of -12.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCMB and JMUB.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCMB	JMUB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.13%	-12.50%	+6.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.92%	-2.55%	-0.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.57%	-4.79%	-0.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-12.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	-0.59%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.32%	-2.51%	+1.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.87%	0.73%	+0.14%

Volatility

SCMB vs. JMUB - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) has a higher volatility of 1.04% compared to JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB) at 0.86%. This indicates that SCMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCMB	JMUB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.04%	0.86%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.17%	1.83%	+0.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.94%	2.40%	+0.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.16%	3.33%	+0.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.16%	4.14%	+0.02%

SCMB vs. JMUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCMB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than JMUB's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SCMB vs. JMUB - Dividend Comparison

SCMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than JMUB's 3.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
JMUB JPMorgan Municipal ETF	3.60%	3.52%	3.50%	3.20%	2.16%	1.94%	2.13%	3.66%	0.45%
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	3.54%	3.36%	3.34%	3.10%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCMB and JMUB in my portfolio?

SCMB and JMUB have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCMB or JMUB?

SCMB has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to JMUB (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCMB dropped -6.13% vs JMUB's -12.50%.

Which ETF is better, SCMB or JMUB?

On 3-year performance, JMUB leads with 3.91% vs 3.37% for SCMB. On fees, SCMB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, JMUB has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCMB or JMUB?

Over the 3-year period, JMUB has performed better with a 3.91% return vs 3.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCMB or JMUB?

SCMB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JMUB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCMB or JMUB?

JMUB has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 3.54% for SCMB.

What is the main difference between SCMB and JMUB?

They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCMB and 0.18% for JMUB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JMUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.