SCMB vs. FUMB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCMB (Schwab Municipal Bond ETF) and FUMB (First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. SCMB is passively managed, while FUMB is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SCMB returned 3.37%/yr vs 2.98%/yr for FUMB. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCMB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FUMB.

Performance

SCMB vs. FUMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) and First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF (FUMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with SCMB at 1.07% and FUMB at 1.07%.

SCMB

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 1.07%
• 6M: 1.55%
• 1Y: 6.86%
• 3Y*: 3.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FUMB

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: 1.07%
• 6M: 1.30%
• 1Y: 2.55%
• 3Y*: 2.98%
• 5Y*: 1.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCMB vs. FUMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	1.07%	3.78%	0.91%	5.86%	3.05%
FUMB First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF	1.07%	2.78%	3.05%	2.84%	0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between SCMB and FUMB is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2022	0.26

Return for Risk

SCMB vs. FUMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCMB

SCMB Risk / Return Rank: 64
SCMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
SCMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
SCMB Omega Ratio Rank: 81
SCMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
SCMB Martin Ratio Rank: 47

FUMB

FUMB Risk / Return Rank: 95
FUMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FUMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FUMB Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FUMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FUMB Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCMB vs. FUMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) and First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF (FUMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCMB	FUMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	3.38	-1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.45	5.34	-1.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.76	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	11.70	-9.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.89	44.37	-36.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCMB vs. FUMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCMB Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is lower than the FUMB Sharpe Ratio of 3.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCMB and FUMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCMB	FUMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34	3.38	-1.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.97	1.00	-0.03

Drawdowns

SCMB vs. FUMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCMB drawdown since its inception was -6.13%, which is greater than FUMB's maximum drawdown of -2.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCMB and FUMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCMB	FUMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.13%	-2.68%	-3.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.92%	-0.22%	-2.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.57%	-0.60%	-4.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-1.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	-0.03%	-0.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.32%	-0.19%	-1.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.87%	0.06%	+0.81%

Volatility

SCMB vs. FUMB - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) has a higher volatility of 1.04% compared to First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF (FUMB) at 0.20%. This indicates that SCMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCMB	FUMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.04%	0.20%	+0.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.17%	0.53%	+1.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.94%	0.76%	+2.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.16%	1.16%	+3.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.16%	1.77%	+2.39%

SCMB vs. FUMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCMB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FUMB's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCMB vs. FUMB - Dividend Comparison

SCMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, more than FUMB's 2.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FUMB First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF	2.80%	2.90%	2.86%	2.24%	1.02%	0.43%	0.94%	1.74%	0.15%
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	3.54%	3.36%	3.34%	3.10%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCMB and FUMB in my portfolio?

SCMB and FUMB have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCMB or FUMB?

SCMB has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to FUMB (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCMB dropped -6.13% vs FUMB's -2.68%.

Which ETF is better, SCMB or FUMB?

On 3-year performance, SCMB leads with 3.37% vs 2.98% for FUMB. On fees, SCMB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FUMB has been the lower-risk option at 0.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCMB or FUMB?

Over the 3-year period, SCMB has performed better with a 3.37% return vs 2.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCMB or FUMB?

SCMB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FUMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCMB or FUMB?

SCMB has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 2.80% for FUMB.

What is the main difference between SCMB and FUMB?

They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCMB and 0.45% for FUMB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FUMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.38 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.